Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sweet violets

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mayerling
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    Why would an illiterate person have been more likely than a literate person to have said they heard someone singing "a violet plucked from my mother's grave when a boy" if they did not hear those words being sung?
    You will notice that I asked the question if anyone ever saw proof that Mrs. Cox could read. The point was if she (or whoever made the statement regarding the wrong "Violets" song) could not read, it would mean they were basing their statement on a confusion that someone who read the earlier information would not have made.

    Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by Joshua Rogan View Post
    Well, as it seems that the press seem to have been better informed about the song than the witnesses, I suspect the murderer was a reporter for the PMG.
    The press is often used for the communication of serial killers.

    Just because I do not believe in specific events in the past does not mean that they did not occur.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    If we look at Cox's evidence, we see that she said she heard Kelly singing "a violet I plucked from my mother's grave when a boy" at about midnight and then, a quarter of an hour later, Kelly was "still singing" and then having gone out and returned at 1am, Kelly "was singing then".

    I doubt Kelly was singing one song that whole time so she must have sung a number of songs. Perhaps "Sweet Violets" was one of them, perhaps not. There's no good evidence for it. The PMG was almost certainly confused due to the similarity of lyric. But, really, what does it matter? Kelly sung a few songs. So what?
    So what, yes. And so you do not need to comment on it, since you do not care about it.

    You do not contribute to the case, David.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joshua Rogan
    replied
    Well, as it seems that the press seem to have been better informed about the song than the witnesses, I suspect the murderer was a reporter for the PMG.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    You don't seem to be doing a good job of either.
    Why do you think I would care about your rude comments?

    They do not lead the case forward. And I do not care about anything else but the case.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    If we look at Cox's evidence, we see that she said she heard Kelly singing "a violet I plucked from my mother's grave when a boy" at about midnight and then, a quarter of an hour later, Kelly was "still singing" and then having gone out and returned at 1am, Kelly "was singing then".

    I doubt Kelly was singing one song that whole time so she must have sung a number of songs. Perhaps "Sweet Violets" was one of them, perhaps not. There's no good evidence for it. The PMG was almost certainly confused due to the similarity of lyric. But, really, what does it matter? Kelly sung a few songs. So what?

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    I am in the process of establishing this right now and at the same time in the process of trying to disprove it.
    You don't seem to be doing a good job of either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    [QUOTE=David Orsam;390084]

    For this question to be meaningful, don't you first have to establish that the song had any connection with the Whitechapel murders?
    I am in the process of establishing this right now and at the same time in the process of trying to disprove it.

    Even you accept that Kelly did not sing "Sweet Violets" so where is the connection with the murders?
    The connection is the press if there is a connection.

    Leave a comment:


  • miss marple
    replied
    I'm sure that if Mrs Cox heard Mary singing Violets from my Mother's grave, thats what she heard, its very precise. The provinance of the song is interesting,Will H Fox an American, stole it from Harry Kennedy who wrote a song called 'A flower from my Angel mother's grave' published in 1878 which made him a lot of money. The song was published in England, it was a sentimental music hall ballard .The Mothers Grave was a popular piece of sentiment in Ireland and there are many poems and and songs about Mothers Graves, the original song may even have been descended from an old irish folk song.
    Will H Fox had great sucess on the Music Halls in the 1890s with a comedy piano act called' Paddywhiski' based on Padereski. He Published an advert in The Era in 1899 complaining about people copying his act.
    I dont see what MK was singing has to do with her death though.


    Miss Marple

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    If you would interpret the lyrics from that starting point, with a perspective connected to the Whitechapel murders, what would your interpretation be?
    For this question to be meaningful, don't you first have to establish that the song had any connection with the Whitechapel murders?

    At the moment you seem to rely on a newspaper report but have failed to deal with the suggestion that the paper is most likely confused about what song was heard.

    Even you accept that Kelly did not sing "Sweet Violets" so where is the connection with the murders?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by Joshua Rogan View Post
    What makes you so sure Zillah is alive? I suspect that an equally valid interpretation is that the flowers are to put on Zillah's grave.
    I have a source that shows that she was alive.

    Regards, Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • Joshua Rogan
    replied
    What makes you so sure Zillah is alive? I suspect that an equally valid interpretation is that the flowers are to put on Zillah's grave.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by Mayerling View Post
    David and Pierre, you are absolutely correct "Sweet Violets" does not mention a grave - actually the singer is possibly giving the flowers to Zillah who is alive. I read the poem more hastily than I should have.

    Jeff
    Hi Jeff,

    Yes, the "I" in the text is giving the flowers to "Zillah" who is alive. And the flowers are dead. They have been plucked but still look up to heaven.

    If you would interpret the lyrics from that starting point, with a perspective connected to the Whitechapel murders, what would your interpretation be?

    Best wishes, Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • Joshua Rogan
    replied
    Cox also gave an earlier time for hearing the song; 11:45 PM. In fact she goes as far as to say Kelly started singing as she walked through the door after saying goodnight, so there's a good chance she saw Kelly singing, as well as being told by her that she was going to sing.
    If she was just repeating what she'd read in the paper she got the details surprisingly wrong. And perjured herself.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Mayerling View Post
    A non-literate person hearing the victim in a sensational murder may have been singing a currently popular ballad regarding Violets, might confuse the two.
    Why would an illiterate person have been more likely than a literate person to have said they heard someone singing "a violet plucked from my mother's grave when a boy" if they did not hear those words being sung?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X