Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
View Post
I refer also to # 497 of the same thread, in which I posed the following question:
Anderson was definite that the witness did not recognise the suspect as being Jewish and that it was only on learning that the person he had identified was Jewish that he refused to testify against him.
Can you please explain why Levy would have needed to be reminded that his relative, whom he is alleged to have recognised in Duke Street, was Jewish?
I refer also to your dissertation An Alternate Kosminski Suspect and Police Witness: Some Perspectives and Points to Ponder
at
from which I quote:
I suggest ... evidence came to light indicating that either Kosminski may have been involved in the Coles killing, or that (more likely) the police learned from Lawende that Levy knew the Kosminski family... Levy is then tracked down and reluctantly taken to the Seaside Home to identify Kosminski. He fails to give evidence against Kosminski.
You make the same mistake of thinking it possible that Anderson's witness could have known the suspect before he saw him in Church Passage.
I note that in the same article, instead of accepting that Kosminski could not have committed the murder of Frances Coles, you hypothesise that a different Kosminski killed Coles and that Aaron was involved in the earlier murders, with Swanson considering the murder of Coles as the last in the series.
Having two Kosminskis murdering women in London when there is not a shred of evidence that anyone called Kosminski ever murdered anyone goes well with your implied suggestion that Joseph Hyam Levy had to be reminded that someone already known to him was Jewish.
Comment