Originally posted by Pierre
View Post
You are, bizarrely, replying to a post made by Monty on 13 November 2015 (#86) which you replied to on the very same day (#98). You said back then:
"there is no "source itself", there is only our interpretations of it."
Now you are saying that there is a source itself and you were speaking of the reliability of it.
To say I'm confused is a bit of an understatement.
Leave a comment: