World Exclusive, ripper revealed?

[GUT]

Dear all,

Why send this to The Daily Mail (of all papers... not got a great reputation anyway and hardly the most read).. why not send this stuff to a scientist/Scientific magasine or even the British Medical Journal?


15 mins of fame again?


Phil

Or maybe serious journals were simply not interested [justifiably or otherwise].

[Phil Carter]

Dear all,

And here is a lovely thought. NOBODY can re-test that shawl anyway now... because from the photo I can see... the owner isn't even wearing GLOVES... and it is impossible not to refold that piece of cloth just by holding the tinyest of corners. (Because it has to be picked up from the table amongst other things)


Cornered?


Phil

[Phil Carter]

Or maybe serious journals were simply not interested [justifiably or otherwise].

Hello GUT,

In which case, that sets a standard for the level of seriousness to start with, no?

best regards


Phil

[GUT]

Hello GUT,

In which case, that sets a standard for the level of seriousness to start with, no?

best regards


Phil

No arguments from this little black duck, I am also interested that this morning no fewer than three threads started on just this topic.

[PaulB]

Dear all,

Why send this to The Daily Mail (of all papers... not got a great reputation anyway and hardly the most read).. why not send this stuff to a scientist/Scientific magasine or even the British Medical Journal?


15 mins of fame again?




Phil

As said elsewhere, it wasn't just sent to the Daily Mail. The book has been known about for ages and been subject to an nda which was lifted today, press releases sent out to lesser media and so on.

[Stewart P Evans]

The Sad History

The sad history of this 'shawl' can be traced back through message board archives. As we know it has been scientifically tested in the past for TV programmes and failed to pass muster, there being no provable bloodstains on it, nor DNA. However, it has been so totally mishandled since it first entered, stage left, that it is hopelessly contaminated by now anyway. And, of course, the provenance is abysmal.

[lynn cates]

nuisance

Hello Phil. Yes, sick. Bloody nuisance. Just when there is so much REAL research to do.

Cheers.
LC

[Phil Carter]

The sad history of this 'shawl' can be traced back through message board archives. As we know it has been scientifically tested in the past for TV programmes and failed to pass muster, there being no provable bloodstains on it, nor DNA. However, it has been so totally mishandled since it first entered, stage left, that it is hopelessly contaminated by now anyway. And, of course, the provenance is abysmal.

Hello Stewart,

Thank you.




Phil

[lynn cates]

kudos

Hello Paul. It must be said that you and all serious Kosminski researchers are to be HIGHLY commended for your restraint just now.

Kudos.

Cheers.
LC

[Rob Clack]

You can bet your bottom dollar that a certain well known Ripperologist is involved in this somewhere. Someone with good connections to the Black Museum.

Phil

So who is it you are slandering?

Rob

[Phil Carter]

So who is it you are slandering?

Rob

Ahh.. the amazing Mr Clack poppeth up.

How entertaining. Sunday lunch will never be the same.

Mr Clack... Do try and cause concern in another world Mr Clack. I am sure you can if you try. There's a good fellow. Now run along, there's a good chap.

Im sure you have your own business to attend to without mixing your good self up in other people's.

Have a lovely Sunday :-)

[Phil Carter]

Hello Phil. Yes, sick. Bloody nuisance. Just when there is so much REAL research to do.

Cheers.
LC

Hello Lynn,

It won't stop those who want the bandwagon of the industry to carry on churning out garbage until someone somewhere puts a stop to it.

Sad and sick indeed.


best wishes

Phil

[Rob Clack]

Ahh.. the amazing Mr Clack poppeth up.

How entertaining. Sunday lunch will never be the same.

Mr Clack... Do try and cause concern in another world Mr Clack. I am sure you can if you try. There's a good fellow. Now run along, there's a good chap.

Im sure you have your own business to attend to without mixing your good self up in other people's.

Have a lovely Sunday :-)

Deflect the issue why don't you. Tell you what, put your hands in your trouser pockets. Dig deep and try and find some balls.

Throwing out snide insinuations and slanderous comments without having the guts to name them isn't going to get you anywhere.

Still nothing new from you.

[PaulB]

Hello Paul. It must be said that you and all serious Kosminski researchers are to be HIGHLY commended for your restraint just now.

Kudos.

Cheers.
LC

As much as I appreciate what you say, I'm not really a Kosminski researcher and I not only doff my cap to but am also left in the shade by the work done by Chris Phillips and Rob House. But I shall nevertheless be interested to read Russell Edwards' book when it lands on my doormat. It's been long awaited.

[Phil Carter]

Deflect the issue why don't you. Tell you what, put your hands in your trouser pockets. Dig deep and try and find some balls.

Throwing out snide insinuations and slanderous comments without having the guts to name them isn't going to get you anywhere.

Still nothing new from you.

Still doing the personal attack lark Mr Clack? Not good... thread after different thread. Oh dear... would does that mean?

Tutt tutt.