Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
World Exclusive, ripper revealed?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by pmerryman View Post
Incredible, indeed.
"Naming Jack The Ripper, by Russell Edwards, will be published by Sidgwick & Jackson on September 9, priced £16.99. "
ha!
I'll wait from police confirmation.Is it progress when a cannibal uses a fork?
- Stanislaw Jerzy Lee
Comment
-
I think someone needs to check on Ed and Christer, see if those guys are ok.
And maybe Simon Wood too.
Must be upsetting for them. ;-)
Monty
Monty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Monty,
Thanks for your concern.
My fit of uncontrollable laughter lasted a fair while, but I'm okay.
First the diary, then the marginalia and now a shawl.
Gotta go. The giggles are coming back.
Regards,
Simon
Yes, this did make me laugh also. I can imagine what good ol Melvin Harris is making of this from the heavens.
Oh the rage.
Monty
Monty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
Well, that's it then innit? case solved.....
Now what?
JtRmap.com<< JtR Interactive Map
JtRmap FORM << Use this form to make suggestions for map annotations
---------------------------------------------------
JtR3d.com << JtR 3D & #VR Website
---------------------------------------------------
Comment
-
The Daily Mail has a long history of promoting unreliable theories of the Ripper's identity. As always we need to wait for the full details before reaching a conclusion. Some preliminary questions that occur to me from the article are:
1. How reliable is the test on Eddowes' descendant, bearing in mind that there are good reasons to doubt the provenance of the shawl?
2. Mr Edwards states that the shawl was too expensive to belong to Eddowes. How then did Kosminski afford it?
3. How reliable is the vacuuming DNA test? Has it been used in other cases and independently verified as a proper scientific method?
4. Will Mr Edwards and Dr Louhelainen allow other scientists to check their conclusions?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Good Michael View PostThe best conclusion here is that Kosminski was a cross-dresser.
Mike
Do they still put a cape around you haven't needed a hair cut for years.G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paddy View PostWasnt Eddowes skirt said to have michaelmas daisys on it ?
Pat..............G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
Comment