If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hi Paul. The phrase is obnoxious because it's misleading and it's bad history. Macnaghten believed there were five victims and Fido believed it as well, therefore it's fact? I don't think so. I would suggest attributing that number to its primary source - Macnaghten, i.e. the Macnaghten Five. Adding Tabram you'd have the Anderson Six. The Arnold Four, Percy Clark Three, Reid Ten, Hawley Eighty-four, etc.
And I believe the Dew Seven. Plus many of the police did not say how many victims there were, IIRC, that includes Abberline, Littlechild, Monro, Swanson, Smith. And then there were the opinions of the doctors. Thomas Bond went with the C5 + Mackenzie. I'm not sure about the others.
"The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren
"Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer
And I believe the Dew Seven. Plus many of the police did not say how many victims there were, IIRC, that includes Abberline, Littlechild, Monro, Swanson, Smith. And then there were the opinions of the doctors. Thomas Bond went with the C5 + Mackenzie. I'm not sure about the others.
Hi Paul. The phrase is obnoxious because it's misleading and it's bad history. Macnaghten believed there were five victims and Fido believed it as well, therefore it's fact? I don't think so. I would suggest attributing that number to its primary source - Macnaghten, i.e. the Macnaghten Five. Adding Tabram you'd have the Anderson Six. The Arnold Four, Percy Clark Three, Reid Ten, Hawley Eighty-four, etc. If there was a similar debate over the Holmes works authored by Doyle, I'm not aware of it.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
I don't know that Martin believed there were only the Macnaghten five victims. He searched for and suggested some other might-have-been victims. But from 1888 until the 1960s or later, in most writings about the Ripper those five were almost exclusively discussed in any detail. Martin was simply casting around for shorthand to distinguish those five from other possibilities. It became accepted.
And I believe the Dew Seven. Plus many of the police did not say how many victims there were, IIRC, that includes Abberline, Littlechild, Monro, Swanson, Smith. And then there were the opinions of the doctors. Thomas Bond went with the C5 + Mackenzie. I'm not sure about the others.
Dr. Frederick Gordon Brown believed that at least one, probably two Ripper murders were committed after the death of Druitt. I'm not sure if the Brown Nine were the same as the Reid Nine.
"The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren
"Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer
Comment