Local Knowledge

[Herlock Sholmes]

Cheers Gazza,

I’d considered the idea of the apron being used on an injury sustained during the murder (although the suggestion didn’t originate with me) but I hadn’t considered George’s suggestion that the killer might have did from an infection causing the cessation of the murders. I’ll through in another suggestion for thoughts…could an infection have led to an amputation? The loss of a hand would have put paid to the killers career.

Have we come up with to new ‘possibles’ as to why the murders appeared to stop?

[GBinOz]

Cheers Gazza,

I’d considered the idea of the apron being used on an injury sustained during the murder (although the suggestion didn’t originate with me) but I hadn’t considered George’s suggestion that the killer might have did from an infection causing the cessation of the murders. I’ll through in another suggestion for thoughts…could an infection have led to an amputation? The loss of a hand would have put paid to the killers career.

Have we come up with to new ‘possibles’ as to why the murders appeared to stop?

Hi Herlock,

There are always possibles, it's the probables that count. Loss of a limb is a possible.

Cheers, George

[The Rookie Detective]

A potential life changing injury caused by a misplaced cut during the obliteration of MJK, may not only explain the reason why there was a distinct 8 month gap before McKenzie was murdered, but it may also explain why McKenzie's injuries were not even close to the severity inflicted on MJK and Eddowes.

There is a scenario whereby the killer cut himself, was severely ill from an infection, and then after months of recovery finally took to re-commencing operations in July 1889 with McKenzie.

Only this time he lacked the dexterity and physical capabilities required to inflict the level of injuries he had previously delivered upon his previous 2 victims.

That may explain why McKenzie's wounds, body position etc.. were very similar to that of Nichols.

Was the killer going back to basics?

Perhaps the killer had intended to cut and eviscerate McKenzie exactly like he had done with Eddowes, but simply couldn't do what he wanted because of his previous rampage on MJK that all but put an end to his career as a killer of Unfortunates.

What kind of wound could do that?

The more obvious ones i would suggest;

a cut to the tendon of the thumb
a cut to the artery running through the thumb
severance/partial severance of a finger
a cut to the wrist/ lower forearm from a broken blade snapped from the hilt of his knife that unexpectedly rebounded (this may have occurred during the process of trying to decapitate MJK)


One thing the killer almost certainly would never have admitted to; that he had made a botch job and had accidentally cut himself.

Although the idea that a psychopath like the Ripper may also have been an overzealous moron who wasn't as skilled with a knife as he thought he was, makes me chuckle