Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Conditions in London in 1888

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    At the Catherine murder scene, by the time the police had a co-ordinated search underway it was around 20 minutes after the murder. That's easily enough time for the WM to have been long gone.

    Given that he operated when it was dark, the WM had the advantage of being able to hear footsteps approaching and so he could disappear before a witness/policeman was on top of him. In the absence of catching him red handed, there wasn't a lot the police could do.

    In terms of being local, I don't think he necessarily had to be given the aforementioned points. I don't think the WM necessarily used an extensive knowledge of the streets in order to get around.

    What may point to him being local, however, is connections between the victims and particularly the lodging houses, e.g. 35 Dorset Street. Tom Wescott pointed out that four women who lived at 18 and 19 George Street were assaulted in a short space of time, three of them murdered. Given that murder was rare in Victorian London, that really is extraordinary.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by harry View Post
      A person could reside local,yet not be a local.How long does it take to become familiar with a district such as Whitechapel?
      25+ years.
      My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Fleetwood Mac View Post
        What may point to him being local, however, is connections between the victims and particularly the lodging houses, e.g. 35 Dorset Street. Tom Wescott pointed out that four women who lived at 18 and 19 George Street were assaulted in a short space of time, three of them murdered. Given that murder was rare in Victorian London, that really is extraordinary.
        Click image for larger version

Name:	Victim_dwellings.jpg
Views:	206
Size:	65.9 KB
ID:	795577

        Canonical five lodgings around time of death shown as V, W, X, Y, Z.
        B is Chapman murder site, and E is MJK.

        Could it be possible that Jack lived in this area and knew the victims??

        Cheers, George
        The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.

        ​Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

          Click image for larger version

Name:	Victim_dwellings.jpg
Views:	206
Size:	65.9 KB
ID:	795577

          Canonical five lodgings around time of death shown as V, W, X, Y, Z.
          B is Chapman murder site, and E is MJK.

          Could it be possible that Jack lived in this area and knew the victims??

          Cheers, George
          Possible, George. I've often wondered whether or not he knew Mary and was a friend. 'Not murdered out of revenge or anything like that, but the only way the WM was able to achieve his goal and so Mary was expendable.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Fleetwood Mac View Post
            At the Catherine murder scene, by the time the police had a co-ordinated search underway it was around 20 minutes after the murder. That's easily enough time for the WM to have been long gone.

            Given that he operated when it was dark, the WM had the advantage of being able to hear footsteps approaching and so he could disappear before a witness/policeman was on top of him. In the absence of catching him red handed, there wasn't a lot the police could do.

            In terms of being local, I don't think he necessarily had to be given the aforementioned points. I don't think the WM necessarily used an extensive knowledge of the streets in order to get around.

            What may point to him being local, however, is connections between the victims and particularly the lodging houses, e.g. 35 Dorset Street. Tom Wescott pointed out that four women who lived at 18 and 19 George Street were assaulted in a short space of time, three of them murdered. Given that murder was rare in Victorian London, that really is extraordinary.
            I couldn’t agree more re the local knowledge. What kind of local knowledge could have prevented the killer from being caught in the back yard of Hanbury Street, or on his way out through the passageway? Once out in the street the choice is simply turn left or right.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by DJA View Post

              25+ years.
              A week would suffice.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

                Click image for larger version

Name:	Victim_dwellings.jpg
Views:	206
Size:	65.9 KB
ID:	795577

                Canonical five lodgings around time of death shown as V, W, X, Y, Z.
                B is Chapman murder site, and E is MJK.

                Could it be possible that Jack lived in this area and knew the victims??

                Cheers, George
                'Should have said, George, surely that is not a coincidence when the following are considered: rarity of murder, number of lodging houses in the area and number of prostitutes operating outside of that immediate vicinity. 'Maybe someone well acquainted with the lodging houses and even followed the victims prior to their murder. Having said that, Catherine wouldn't fit.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Something I have read in a few books were the rules, or lack of them, when it comes to building and planning. It meant that even on a summer afternoon, in some places in the East End you didn't get as much sun light reaching the ground as you do now as it was so built up.
                  These are not clues, Fred.
                  It is not yarn leading us to the dark heart of this place.
                  They are half-glimpsed imaginings, tangle of shadows.
                  And you and I floundering at them in the ever vainer hope that we might corral them into meaning when we will not.
                  We will not.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X