What 5 Questions Would You Like Answered?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    And...

    Many thanks and much appreciation to all of you posters who are willing to discuss and engage in a reasonable and productive manner. You have my grattitude. My crappy spelling and insufficient phrasing as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Hullo Trevor! Great to have you in here.

    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
    The neat pile suggest she could have put them there herself intending to pick them up after engaging in her sexual activity.

    No evidence to show the killer cut her pocket. Best not jump to the wrong conclusions.

    As to Kate how do we know that the items found on the floor did not simply fall out of her pockets when she fell to the to the ground or when the killer lifted up her clothes.

    Two sides to every argument it seems though as if many want to look at it one sided
    On your first point, it seems like emptying your belongings before coetus an unlikely and impractical thing. How long did those encounters usually last I wonder? And why a neat pile? On your third point, weren't all the belongings she had all on the ground? Everything fell out? On your final point, two sides? Ha, we should be so lucky were there only two to contend with. Many blessings.

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Hullo Lynn and Rivkah!

    Rings, could just be grab whatever might be valuable just in case. Now, if you wanna go deeper, or possibly deeper, the murderer could have thought the rings were of some importance to the victim then they might have been very valuable to the murderer. Pure fanciful meandering. As far as Eddowes being concerned with the time for working rounds, it is possible of course but I think her reason for it all the more likely. When people ask why she went the direction she did I tend to think it was for drink. That being one of the most likely options. I'm advancing towards the fridge currently.

    Leave a comment:


  • RivkahChaya
    replied
    Originally posted by Digalittledeeperwatson View Post
    I don't think that has ever been a time where some people didn't go through trash for food.
    I was thinking more in terms of making regular rounds, something a lot of homeless people do on a schedule. There are occasional turf wars. That could even explain why she was watching the clock.
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello DLD W. Thanks.

    I believe that Annie's assailant was doing just that. Sadly, he had no idea what was valuable, thinking brass rings were gold.

    Cheers.
    LC
    He also wasn't terribly savvy, if he though someone with gold rings would be turning tricks in alleys.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    value

    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    I believe that Annie's assailant was doing just that. Sadly, he had no idea what was valuable, thinking brass rings were gold.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Okay.

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    "As I have said before, I think anyways, maybe he engaged in the rifling whilst waiting on the body to bleed out some. Retrieving one's money is not a unreasonable thing to do, especially if one is poor."

    That is, if one paid any money.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Keeping with that line. No money was exchanged, okay, why can he not simply be going through their belongings to see if there was anything valuable?

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    cuts and such

    Hello Trevor. Thanks.

    "The neat pile suggests she could have put them there herself intending to pick them up after engaging in her sexual activity."

    But why take them out in the first place? And if the killer did it, surely he was mentally unstable?

    "No evidence to show the killer cut her pocket. Best not jump to the wrong conclusions."

    Whom cut it then? Surely not Annie?

    "As to Kate how do we know that the items found on the floor did not simply fall out of her pockets when she fell to the ground or when the killer lifted up her clothes."

    The killer cut through her clothes. Unlike Polly and Annie. And how does a mustard tin merely fall out?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    money

    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    "As I have said before, I think anyways, maybe he engaged in the rifling whilst waiting on the body to bleed out some. Retrieving one's money is not a unreasonable thing to do, especially if one is poor."

    That is, if one paid any money.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Last edited by lynn cates; 07-02-2013, 11:23 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jmenges
    replied
    A neat pile indeed.

    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    Yes, Annie's rings were stolen and her pocked cut through. Her effects were arranged in a neat pile.

    And it was after sun up. But, clearly the murderer was in no hurry.

    Kate was rifled too. But, no neat pile.

    Cheers.
    LC
    The neat pile suggest she could have put them there herself intending to pick them up after engaging in her sexual activity.

    No evidence to show the killer cut her pocket. Best not jump to the wrong conclusions.

    As to Kate how do we know that the items found on the floor did not simply fall out of her pockets when she fell to the to the ground or when the killer lifted up her clothes.

    Two sides to every argument it seems though as if many want to look at it one sided
    Last edited by Trevor Marriott; 07-02-2013, 10:03 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    No need to doubt

    Originally posted by RivkahChaya View Post
    Did people ever dumpster dive for food them? If so, could Eddowes have been concerned about the time, because there was a prime dumpster-diving hour, when most of the restaurants closed?

    Also, I don't know whether this happened back in 1888, in poor sections, but I know that when I was in college, I'd hear people talk about picking up abandoned drinks in bars, where mixed drinks are really expensive. I was pretty much eavesdropping, so I didn't ask questions, but I don't know whether people were watching for literally abandoned drinks, because people would leave before they finished, and you can't take a drink out of a bar (at least, not in any state where I've ever gone to a bar), or whether they were actually stealing drinks from people who went to the bathroom, or got up to dance.
    I don't think that has ever been a time where some people didn't go through trash for food.

    Leave a comment:


  • RivkahChaya
    replied
    Did people ever dumpster dive for food them? If so, could Eddowes have been concerned about the time, because there was a prime dumpster-diving hour, when most of the restaurants closed?

    Also, I don't know whether this happened back in 1888, in poor sections, but I know that when I was in college, I'd hear people talk about picking up abandoned drinks in bars, where mixed drinks are really expensive. I was pretty much eavesdropping, so I didn't ask questions, but I don't know whether people were watching for literally abandoned drinks, because people would leave before they finished, and you can't take a drink out of a bar (at least, not in any state where I've ever gone to a bar), or whether they were actually stealing drinks from people who went to the bathroom, or got up to dance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Hullo Lynn!

    As I have said before, I think anyways, maybe he engaged in the riffling whilst waiting on the body to bleed out some. Retrieving one's money is not a unreasonable thing to do, especially if one is poor.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    rifled

    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    Yes, Annie's rings were stolen and her pocked cut through. Her effects were arranged in a neat pile.

    And it was after sun up. But, clearly the murderer was in no hurry.

    Kate was rifled too. But, no neat pile.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Yeah!

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello DLDW. Thanks.

    So this murderer who had to work quickly stopped to retrieve a few pence?

    Cheers.
    LC
    Weren't Annie and Kate's belongings gone through? Not going into Stride. "MJK" is simple as they were in her room. The only thing about that that has a simple explanation.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X