Why Didn’t They Catch Him?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DJA
    *
    • May 2015
    • 4700

    #61
    Perhaps the Matthews and Abberline were more interested in ensuring he was not captured.

    Look at what happened with the Cleveland Street Scandal the next year.

    Comment

    • Varqm
      Inspector
      • Feb 2008
      • 1130

      #62
      It was 1 to 2 odds he was a visitor. The murders came a day before or end of the month to the 9th
      ,covering around 10 days of an average 30 day month. He did\could not come solely at his own will and choose any day,
      he was somewhat on a fixed schedule. He probably lived\worked in the area before and knew the lay of the land.
      Clearly the first human laws (way older and already established) spawned organized religion's morality - from which it's writers only copied/stole,ex. you cannot kill,rob,steal (forced,it started civil society).
      M. Pacana

      Comment

      • Trevor Marriott
        Commissioner
        • Feb 2008
        • 9453

        #63
        Originally posted by Varqm View Post
        It was 1 to 2 odds he was a visitor. The murders came a day before or end of the month to the 9th
        ,covering around 10 days of an average 30 day month. He did\could not come solely at his own will and choose any day,
        he was somewhat on a fixed schedule. He probably lived\worked in the area before and knew the lay of the land.
        Or he came onboard a merchant vessel which travelled on a regular route to London?

        Comment

        • Herlock Sholmes
          Commissioner
          • May 2017
          • 21899

          #64
          Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

          Or he came onboard a merchant vessel which travelled on a regular route to London?

          www.trevormarriott.co.uk
          Have anyone in mind Trevor?
          Regards

          Sir Herlock Sholmes.

          “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

          Comment

          • Varqm
            Inspector
            • Feb 2008
            • 1130

            #65
            Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

            Or he came onboard a merchant vessel which travelled on a regular route to London?

            www.trevormarriott.co.uk
            Yes. At the very least we agree he was a visitor. There were lots of regular ships\trains going to London regularly. I know you believe he was a sailor, but me as a passenger.
            He did not have to deal with doss houses and nosy people. For one as soon as he hit a street near the Spitalfields market on the early morning of the murder he was just another buyer\merchant.

            On a different topic let me ask you Trevor, if JTR was caught in 1888 and he was Jewish would there have been a riot in the East End, maybe a mini-pogrom in England?
            Last edited by Varqm; 03-24-2022, 02:57 AM.
            Clearly the first human laws (way older and already established) spawned organized religion's morality - from which it's writers only copied/stole,ex. you cannot kill,rob,steal (forced,it started civil society).
            M. Pacana

            Comment

            • Trevor Marriott
              Commissioner
              • Feb 2008
              • 9453

              #66
              Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

              Have anyone in mind Trevor?
              Well funny you should say that because the ships crew lists which were found show he was here when Frances Coles was murdered and on the same ship that was shown to be here when the others were murdered

              Comment

              • Trevor Marriott
                Commissioner
                • Feb 2008
                • 9453

                #67
                Originally posted by Varqm View Post

                Yes. At the very least we agree he was a visitor. There were lots of regular ships\trains going to London regularly. I know you believe he was a sailor, but me as a passenger.
                He did not have to deal with doss houses and nosy people. For one as soon as he hit a street near the Spitalfields market on the early morning of the murder he was just another buyer\merchant.

                On a different topic let me ask you Trevor, if JTR was caught in 1888 and he was Jewish would there have been a riot in the East End, maybe a mini-pogrom in England?
                I doubt that, I am sure the Jewish people were just as apalled by the killings as all the other ethnic groups and dont forget the jews made up the greater population in the East End in 1888.

                Jewish criminals were constantly arrested and imprisioned for crimes without uprisings againt the jewish community

                Comment

                • mpriestnall
                  Inspector
                  • Apr 2019
                  • 1190

                  #68
                  I don't agree with the inference that Jack wasn't caught. I believe he was arrested and let go post the double event.

                  The police treatment of Packer, the non-appearance of Schwartz at Stride's inquest, the release of the Dear Boss letters to provide a misleading narrative are all consistent with the start of a police cover up. IMHO.
                  Sapere Aude

                  Comment

                  • erobitha
                    Chief Inspector
                    • Apr 2019
                    • 1731

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

                    I doubt that, I am sure the Jewish people were just as apalled by the killings as all the other ethnic groups and dont forget the jews made up the greater population in the East End in 1888.

                    Jewish criminals were constantly arrested and imprisioned for crimes without uprisings againt the jewish community

                    www.trevormarriott.co.uk
                    We rarely agree on something Trev, but today we do.

                    I believe the Jewish population was an obvious one to demonise. Most of the recent activism taking place on the streets were led by socialists and grand ideas of worker's rights. Many of these people pushing for reforms were from Eastern European Jewish extraction. Bloody Sunday in November 1887, under Charles Warren's watch, left a bitter taste of resentment towards these people from the police and establishment.

                    Focusing on a Jewish killer kept any notions of a peasants' revolt in London well under control. I ultimately believe that the Jewish community were equally appalled at these crimes as any other community were.

                    I believe Charles Warren's excuse for wiping out the GSG (by his hand) was because he was worried about a riot. Yet, the GSG was printed in full in the newspapers over the following days.

                    Not one riot took place.
                    Author of 'Jack the Ripper: Threads' out now on Amazon > UK | USA | CA | AUS
                    JayHartley.com

                    Comment

                    • Aethelwulf
                      Inactive
                      • Aug 2021
                      • 1125

                      #70
                      Originally posted by mpriestnall View Post
                      I don't agree with the inference that Jack wasn't caught. I believe he was arrested and let go post the double event.

                      The police treatment of Packer, the non-appearance of Schwartz at Stride's inquest, the release of the Dear Boss letters to provide a misleading narrative are all consistent with the start of a police cover up. IMHO.
                      Surely this belongs on the 'most ridiculous' thread!

                      Comment

                      • Darryl Kenyon
                        Inspector
                        • Nov 2014
                        • 1238

                        #71
                        Originally posted by erobitha View Post


                        I believe the Jewish population was an obvious one to demonise. Most of the recent activism taking place on the streets were led by socialists and grand ideas of worker's rights. Many of these people pushing for reforms were from Eastern European Jewish extraction. Bloody Sunday in November 1887, under Charles Warren's watch, left a bitter taste of resentment towards these people from the police and establishment.

                        Focusing on a Jewish killer kept any notions of a peasants' revolt in London well under control. I ultimately believe that the Jewish community were equally appalled at these crimes as any other community were.

                        .
                        So the police took their eye off the ball by just hoping the killer was Jewish ?

                        Comment

                        • mpriestnall
                          Inspector
                          • Apr 2019
                          • 1190

                          #72
                          Originally posted by Aethelwulf View Post

                          Surely this belongs on the 'most ridiculous' thread!
                          Maybe so...
                          Last edited by mpriestnall; 03-25-2022, 03:42 PM.
                          Sapere Aude

                          Comment

                          • Varqm
                            Inspector
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 1130

                            #73
                            Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

                            I doubt that, I am sure the Jewish people were just as apalled by the killings as all the other ethnic groups and dont forget the jews made up the greater population in the East End in 1888.

                            Jewish criminals were constantly arrested and imprisioned for crimes without uprisings againt the jewish community

                            www.trevormarriott.co.uk
                            We'll all people were appalled and the kind of murders were new and barbaric.

                            But with those Jewish criminals, was there a anti-semitic sentiments like in the Chapmans murder or Warren,with aid from a police report,
                            worried that the GSG will cause a riot.Or even MP's concerned\curious about the use of the word Lipski with it's Jewish connotation.

                            This was a different crime wave.
                            Clearly the first human laws (way older and already established) spawned organized religion's morality - from which it's writers only copied/stole,ex. you cannot kill,rob,steal (forced,it started civil society).
                            M. Pacana

                            Comment

                            • erobitha
                              Chief Inspector
                              • Apr 2019
                              • 1731

                              #74
                              Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post

                              So the police took their eye off the ball by just hoping the killer was Jewish ?
                              Certainly those higher up seemed to want to focus on the killer being Jewish. That filters down to the type of investigations that are then undertaken.

                              If officers are constantly being fed the narrative that the killer is most likely Jewish, then that is where you would naturally focus your attention.

                              Aside from Macnaghten’s memo later in 1894 mentioning MJD, it seems up until that point the focus was very much on the Jewish community.
                              Last edited by erobitha; 03-25-2022, 06:23 PM.
                              Author of 'Jack the Ripper: Threads' out now on Amazon > UK | USA | CA | AUS
                              JayHartley.com

                              Comment

                              • Scott Nelson
                                Superintendent
                                • Feb 2008
                                • 2402

                                #75
                                What if there were convincing circumstances that pointed to the Ripper being Jewish?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X