Tweet
I've asked something similar but it was quite some time ago. I would like to re ask this question if I may? What would it take to solve this case where everyone is satisfied? Is it even possible to solve with what we have considering today's technology or would it take discovering some great new item to solve it? If so what would that item have to be? Again, is it even possible?
-
-
Not possible.G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
-
My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Comment
-
Solve one murder?Comment
-
Hitherto unknown artifacts from a victim, with usable DNA? Oh, wait....
A handwritten confession (of sorts), hitherto undiscovered under some floorboards? Ah....
Hidden messages in famous works of art? Hidden messages in famous works of children's literature? Jeff bloody Mudgett?
In all seriousness Clark, it's unsolvable. So little survived, there's more questions than answers. Never mind solving the case, try getting us to agree with each other!Thems the Vagaries.....Comment
-
-
Over the last 16 years I have accumulated more than enough circumstantial evidence to hang Henry Gawen Sutton,except he's already deadOriginally posted by clark2710 View Post
GUT has summed up Ripperologists well.My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email accountComment
-
A time machine!Comment
-
Finding the missing organs, matched through DNA with relatives of the victims. Unless they're found with written documentation with undisputed provenance, it might still be unknown exactly who the killer was.Comment
-
Solved to everyone's satisfaction?
No chance.
After 37 pages (and counting) we can't even reach a consensus as to whether Kate was wearing an apron!!
The thread can run to 137 pages, and it would be a safe bet that there still wouldn't be any agreement!
I say that as someone who would genuinely love to see it definitively solved too!!
Comment
-
So,your hovercraft is full of eelsOriginally posted by Kattrup View Post
My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email accountComment
-
No, my nipples most strenuously explode with delight!Originally posted by DJA View Post
So,your hovercraft is full of eelsComment
-
We knew that she was wearing an apron before the thread started Ms DOriginally posted by Ms Diddles View PostSolved to everyone's satisfaction?
No chance.
After 37 pages (and counting) we can't even reach a consensus as to whether Kate was wearing an apron!!
The thread can run to 137 pages, and it would be a safe bet that there still wouldn't be any agreement!
I say that as someone who would genuinely love to see it definitively solved too!!
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
We knew that she was wearing an apron before the thread started Ms D
Comment
-
The most plausible scenario would be some kind of family heirloom situation: not necessarily one of the missing organs preserved, but something indisputably from a murder scene or a credible confession.
I agree that many here would still reject it.Comment
Comment