London crime wave?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jon Guy
    Assistant Commissioner
    • Feb 2008
    • 3154

    #16
    Hi Lynn

    Forgive my asking but what do you mean by "she was a result of it " ?

    She may have been mutilated as a result of the Whitechapel murders but her murder was simply the result of her refusing the advances of a drunken Waddell
    Last edited by Jon Guy; 12-18-2012, 01:09 PM.

    Comment

    • lynn cates
      Commisioner
      • Aug 2009
      • 13841

      #17
      summary

      Hello Jon. Thanks.

      I think your last sentence sums up neatly what I was saying. Of course, she would have been killed irrespective of events in Whitechapel/Spitalfields. But her mutilations would not have been evidenced.

      Cheers.
      LC

      Comment

      • Jon Guy
        Assistant Commissioner
        • Feb 2008
        • 3154

        #18
        Hi Lynn

        Just for jolly, here`s a detailed account of the affair.

        Comment

        • caz
          Premium Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 10569

          #19
          Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
          Hello Jon. Thanks.

          I think your last sentence sums up neatly what I was saying. Of course, she would have been killed irrespective of events in Whitechapel/Spitalfields. But her mutilations would not have been evidenced.

          Cheers.
          LC
          But doesn't that serve to show just how rare and sensational the Whitechapel mutilation murders must have been, if the one or two examples from elsewhere in the country can be put down to the odd killer getting ideas they would not otherwise have had without the extensive media coverage?

          And where does that leave you with Stride, whose killer could so easily have added a slash here or a rip there, if he had wanted or needed to make her look like another ripper job - unless he was interrupted after all, or didn't dare hang around for the few extra seconds it would have taken him?

          While we might expect the odd copycat mutilation or throat-cutting murder, anywhere the newspapers reached, and committed by someone with a reason for attacking a specific individual, would it not be a truly remarkable coincidence for such a thing to have happened on the same few streets as the crime wave itself, involving the identical victim type, at a similar time of night or day of the week, and in such similar circumstances (no loud screaming, swiftly efficient kill, no sign of the killer running away etc)?

          Love,

          Caz
          X
          Last edited by caz; 12-18-2012, 03:43 PM.
          "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


          Comment

          • Hunter
            Chief Inspector
            • Dec 2009
            • 1745

            #20
            I believe the Gateshead murder greatly influenced Bagster Phillips and his perception of these murders. His only interview on these murders by a Press Association reporter at the close of the Chapman inquest ( Phillips had just returned from Gateshead) is very telling.
            Best Wishes,
            Hunter
            ____________________________________________

            When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888

            Comment

            • lynn cates
              Commisioner
              • Aug 2009
              • 13841

              #21
              Three Tuns

              Hello Jon. Thanks for that. Wish it WERE a bit more jolly.

              Interesting place for an inquest?

              Cheers.
              LC

              Comment

              • lynn cates
                Commisioner
                • Aug 2009
                • 13841

                #22
                criminal mind

                Hello Caroline. Thanks.

                "But doesn't that serve to show just how rare and sensational the Whitechapel mutilation murders must have been, if the one or two examples from elsewhere in the country can be put down to the odd killer getting ideas they would not otherwise have had without the extensive media coverage?"

                Perhaps. It also serves to show how a criminal mind works.

                Stride? Never thought SHE was a copycat--only Eddowes.

                Cheers.
                LC

                Comment

                • lynn cates
                  Commisioner
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 13841

                  #23
                  deep thinker

                  Hello Cris. Thanks.

                  Indeed. Bagster was a VERY conscientious man and thought deeply before making a move.

                  Cheers.
                  LC

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X