Originally posted by Jonathan H
View Post
In fact it is highly possible that it is also Lawende's sighting, only minutes from the murder taking place, which inspired Anderson's dogmatic assersion, "...the only person who had ever had a good view of the murderer at once identified him".
The only person who ever had a view of the murderer, according to the authorities, was associated with the Mitre Square murder.
Anderson's well known claim, made in 1910, has a noticable evolution from an earlier publication in 1899, where it was claimed, "this man was said to resemble the murderer by the one person who got a glimps of him - the police constable in Mitre Court".
Which also appears to have evolved from Macnaghten's earlier draft copy of his reply to the Sun article, where Macnaghten claims, "...this man in appearance strongly resembled the individual seen by the City PC near Mitre Square".
So we can see how Macnaghten's suspect No.2, "strongly resembled an individual", turns into Griffiths, "resembled the murderer", and to Anderson's "was the murderer".
Likewise Macnaghten suggestion that the killer "was seen", turns into Griffiths, "got a glimps", and taken by Anderson to mean "had a good view".
When we trace these assertions by Anderson back to their apparent source we can see that all roads lead to Lawende as the only man who faced the potential killer within minutes of the crime being committed.
And, how a "glimps" becomes exaggerated into a "good view" to bolster the claim that Anderson knew who the Ripper was when he wrote, "..there was no doubt whatsoever as to the identity of the criminal".
So did anyone really see the Ripper?, possibly several, Possibly Mrs Long, possibly PC Smith, possibly Packer, possibly Hutchinson, but only two people saw a "man" with a victim only minutes from the murder occuring and as we know, they were Schwartz & Lawende (with Levy & Harris).
Though Anderson's claim appears to have been inspired by Lawende.
Regards, Jon S.
Comment