If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
They would get about as much as a mobster who had a hit on somebody would.
Washington Irving:
"To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "
I think I know where Chud is coming from. There's no question that whoever committed these murders was evil, but he was also practical. There's a coldness in the murders that suggests a calm hand. This is one of the reasons I find Charles Le Grand the most likely suspect to date.
They would get about as much as a mobster who had a hit on somebody would.
Maybe, but again I must ask: Who would benefit from someone who not only kills a number of women but also violently mutilates them?
A normal East End mobster or pimp? Well, the fact that the murders - unlike others that happened before or after - caused a public hysteria, a huge press echo and the biggest manhunt in British history up to that time tells me that there was more behind it than just the death of at least five women.
This leads me to conclude that if it really was a job, the mutilations were an important part of it. I wouldn't completely rule out this possibility but I must admit that I'm having difficulties imagining a plausible motive for that.
And no, I don't buy the "pimp scares his gals into submission" theory.
Regards,
Boris
~ All perils, specially malignant, are recurrent - Thomas De Quincey ~
This has nothing to do with that theory. However, this will make everything clear. Gangs, terrorists, mobs. What do they all do? Assasinate.
Think about it.
Washington Irving:
"To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "
There's obviously two sides of the fence.
Most people believe that JTR was just a lone mad serial killer in which case no he can't be working to order.
If on the other hand you believe 'there's something different about this' then yes anythings possible.
In the words of Ray McAnally "convince the little man".
Nick Warren puts an excellent theory forward in the mammoth book,well worth a second read,regarding the irish political situation.
If it was a job, there must have been an employer, but I can't think of a plausible reason for an assignment like that.
I can. There's a fairly obvious motive for the killings if you look at the area they were done it (no clues I'm afraid - Ruby don't say a word ). Although I don't believe the killer was paid to do it I do think the motive is a much better one than the sexual killer theory.
if mickey's a mouse, and pluto's a dog, whats goofy?
okay, I see your point about more or less gruesome political or religious assassinations. However, there still are the missing organs. In my opinion, that's a rather personal element of the case which gives raise to doubts about the theory of an hired killer.
Regards,
Boris
~ All perils, specially malignant, are recurrent - Thomas De Quincey ~
I don't really want to talk motives but does anyone else get the feeling that these murders were more of a "job" for JTR than an act of a madman. I cant help thinking that he was working to order.
Hi Chud
I entertained this idea a bit, especially when I heard about the Dr looking to procure organs for some work.
However, if the murders were done for a "working to order" "job", then why the extra mutilations?
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
okay, I see your point about more or less gruesome political or religious assassinations. However, there still are the missing organs. In my opinion, that's a rather personal element of the case which gives raise to doubts about the theory of an hired killer.
Regards,
Boris
Don't get me wrong I don't believe the killer was hired. But I don't believe it was a pervert getting his rocks off either. As for political assassinations - I don't think a few poor women from Whitechapel count here. This is more to do with the killer's personal politics than anything going deeper into the realms of conspiracy or mercenaries.
if mickey's a mouse, and pluto's a dog, whats goofy?
Hello Bolo. I indeed see your point. But what if the missing organ/killing of Annie were perpetrated by a lunatic whilst Kate and MJ's organ removal were merely done--to adopt Wynne Baxter's interesting phrase viv-a-vis Kate--as "possibly the work of an imitator"?
"I don't think a few poor women from Whitechapel count here."
Permit me to inquire, Why not? Don't forget that Edward Jenkinson employed, match girls, barmaids and prostitutes (amongst others) for his intelligence operations. Now, all that is required is that those whom have had their security breached find out, and the purveyor of such information (even if trivial) may find herself in deep faecal material.
Question: What happens to low level informants caught passing (or suspected of passing) information regarding, say, the Mafia? How are they silenced?
Hello Tom. I know of the book by reputation, but even then not too well. I did not realise that he held that view. I thought that he had hypothesised some French chap working for SY as the killer.
Comment