most unlikely ripper theory

[Zodiac]

Steve, that would perhaps explain the little known phonetic version of his statement, in which the man was heard to say 'you shall be alreet for wat I ave told you, madameoiselle'

Hi Trevor,

So you mean that Poirot was actually a Mackem, (often mistaken for a Geordie), posing as a Belgian, (often mistaken for a Frenchman) and was also Jack the Ripper!? No wonder the police couldn't catch him! You realise that this could also throw a whole new light on the "Wearside Jack" tape as well.... "Mother, get publisher ont' phone!"

Best Wishes,

Zodiac.

[Adam Went]

Just trying to picture JTR with an Inspector Clouseau type accent.....wow....

Cheers,
Adam.

[The Grave Maurice]

"If you have the tame at yoor dispoosal, Ah'd lak to shoo you ma kneef."

[Steven Russell]

Ze juice are ze min zat wheel nut be blemmed fur nursing

[Carrotty Nell]

Hello you all!
Well, I once read, that Sherlock Holmes would have been the Ripper!

It is Wilson and Odell who make the case against Sherlock Holmes, and a jolly convincing argument they put forward too. Firstly they observe that two witnesses (Smith and Long) describe the suspect as wearing a deerstalker hat. Secondly, they point out the extremely suspicious circumstance that with the biggest criminal case Britain has ever seen in full progress, the most famous detective of the age is not assigned to it. Does make you wonder doesn't it.

(Very clever Messrs W & O. I wasn't fooled...)