Modus Operandi and Signature

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NOV9
    replied
    Originally posted by kensei View Post
    Annie Chapman did fall. The next door neighbor to 29 Hanbury Street heard the sound of her body falling heavily against the fence.

    Elizabeth Stride not only fell but was seen being forcefully thrown to the ground by her attacker.
    Why did Jack change his MO by throwing Stride to the ground?
    I'm just thinking out loud here, I'm not expecting you to answer.

    Leave a comment:


  • NOV9
    replied
    Originally posted by Doctor X View Post
    Same reason he strangled them at first--to make sure they were dead. Let go, you are not sure. Strangle until they collapse and finish.

    --J.D.
    Sounds more like he needed to be in control, strangled until they fell unconscious, then cut the throat while they were on the ground so that the blood would not spray on himself.

    NOV9

    Leave a comment:


  • NOV9
    replied
    Originally posted by kensei View Post
    Annie Chapman did fall. The next door neighbor to 29 Hanbury Street heard the sound of her body falling heavily against the fence.

    Elizabeth Stride not only fell but was seen being forcefully thrown to the ground by her attacker.

    The next door neighbor to 29 Hanbury Street heard the sound of her body falling heavily against the fence.

    The next door neighbor can not be sure if the body fell or was pushed up against the fence, unless she saw for herself what had happened.

    Leave a comment:


  • kensei
    replied
    Originally posted by NOV9 View Post
    Jack strangled the unfortunates, and did not let the bodies fall to the ground, the absence of bruising to the back of the head. Then he cut the throat.

    So why would he take care not to let them fall? Considering how brutal he was in cutting them up.

    NOV9
    Annie Chapman did fall. The next door neighbor to 29 Hanbury Street heard the sound of her body falling heavily against the fence.

    Elizabeth Stride not only fell but was seen being forcefully thrown to the ground by her attacker.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doctor X
    replied
    Same reason he strangled them at first--to make sure they were dead. Let go, you are not sure. Strangle until they collapse and finish.

    --J.D.

    Leave a comment:


  • NOV9
    replied
    Was it ritualistic, poising the bodies? MO or signature?

    Jack strangled the unfortunates, and did not let the bodies fall to the ground, the absence of bruising to the back of the head. Then he cut the throat.

    So why would he take care not to let them fall? Considering how brutal he was in cutting them up.

    In what direction did he position the head? In reference to the top of the head, was it facing North, South, East, or West?

    Everything he did seems to be ritualistic, poising the bodies, turning their head to face a certain direction.

    NOV9

    Leave a comment:


  • NOV9
    replied
    Understanding a signature

    "Understanding a signature involves behavioral analysis: specifically, examining what a perpetrator does at a scene that's unnecessary to accomplish his or her goal and that appears to be performed to meet some inner personal need."

    Dr. Robert D. Keppel

    Leave a comment:


  • Doctor X
    replied
    The problem I have with "signatures" is they imply that a killer cannot develop a technique or must always follow the same pattern.

    On the other hand, a killer is likely to stick to what works.

    I see more trends than signature.

    --J.D.

    Leave a comment:


  • JSchmidt
    started a topic Modus Operandi and Signature

    Modus Operandi and Signature

    Because we seem to drift off about these topics in quite some threads, I'd suggest we discuss these two aspects in one topic of their own.
    As I'm only reading up on stuff so far I will now leave the center stage to those who are willing to discuss their definitions and theories.
Working...
X