Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The identity of Jack The Ripper Revealed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Daniel,

    In my honest opinion, Mr Taxil is not Jack the Ripper based on your presentation.
    Tax exile, perhaps.

    best wishes

    Phil
    Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


    Justice for the 96 = achieved
    Accountability? ....

    Comment


    • #17
      Hi Daniel,

      I think most of us are guilty of seeing things that we want to see/that aren't there in this case, but seriously this theory goes way beyond the masonic/royal conspiracy theories for sheer incredulity. Trying to spell out NECKS? Really? That's a man who seriously needed a pen.

      D
      "We want to assemble all the incomplete movements, like cubists, until the point is reached where the crime can commit itself."

      Comment


      • #18
        Aside from maybe Taxil matching the eye-witness descriptions, nothing else works with the theory but I have much respect for Dan for trying
        Best regards,
        Adam


        "They assumed Kelly was the last... they assumed wrong" - Me

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by kensei View Post
          I have not posted prior to this on your theories Daniel, but it seems to me that if the victims' names are important in making the plan work, the fact that many prostitutes used "street names" would mean that the killer would not have known all of their real names so wouldn't that throw quite a big monkey wrench into it?
          Dan,

          If you could address Kensei's concern, it would help out.

          Sincerely,

          Mike
          The Ripper's Haunts/JtR Suspect Dr. Francis Tumblety (Sunbury Press)
          http://www.michaelLhawley.com

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Hamrammr View Post
            Trying to spell out NECKS?
            Really? That's a man who seriously needed a pen.

            D
            I agree, Dean. It's a most penfool case.

            Amitiés,
            David

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by mklhawley View Post
              Dan,

              If you could address Kensei's concern, it would help out.

              Sincerely,

              Mike
              Hi everyone:

              Thanks for the replys; I'm sorry for botching my pics presentation and I'll explain everything the best that I can.

              The spelling of NECKS and knowing the victims real names is very important to this sacrifice to Satan. I believe Knowing someone's real name and not someone's made up name, is important to any satanic ritual. Also, if they didn't get their real names then the NECKS couldn't be used for other things I'm working on as we speak or type lol...

              If you look at that horrible blurry pic of Leo Taxil's Full Name you can see how I circled letters of his name in red. Very important, if they didn't get the victims names right, Taxil couldn't use the C for (Chapman) from the right arm of Satan's offering, or the K (Kelly) from the left arm of Satan's offering to create his Demon persona, Jack The Ripper... Just pull the letters down from his real name and add C/K, for JACK THE RIPPER

              Look at the Baphomet's Pic I colored his right bent arm red, Its in a shape of an upside down triangle. and his left arm which is straight black. When you take his crossed legs that represents an X these three symbol's together make a perfect two point up, and one point down satanic pentagram.

              Also, by location of the victims in (red )you have a near perfect triangle and near that, you have a straight line( black). Literally these woman were sacrificed; a blood offering to Satan, Via their NECKS ; literally (IN THE ARMS OF SATAN!)

              Dan...

              Hi Adam...

              Comment


              • #22
                When you put it like that Dan it all makes sense.

                Great find.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Just what I thought dave.

                  Iam suprised noone has thougt of this before, it is so sensible and obvious.

                  doris
                  ..."(this is my literary discovery and is copyright protected)"...

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I agree. How has this been missed up to now? I'll bet Howard Brown has known this all along and has intentionally covered it up. I wonder who he's protecting?

                    Yours truly,

                    Tom Wescott

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Because How has messed up---thats why!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I think you should author a book using this theory.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          If he doesn't, someone else will. If he gets Karen Trenouth on board, he could have the book out by Friday.

                          Yours truly,

                          Tom Wescott

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Thanks to Dan for providing info on the theory. Do you have documented evidence that Leo Taxil was in London at the time of the murders? Not being smart there but it is an important part of anyone's theory or suspect.
                            Best regards,
                            Adam


                            "They assumed Kelly was the last... they assumed wrong" - Me

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I've always thought that the more complicated a theory is, the better it sells. Just look at Stephen Knight as an example. Besides, I'm always attracted to any explanation that involves a Batho-whatsis.

                              Listen to M&P, Dan, and get yourself to a publisher. You'll do well.
                              Last edited by The Grave Maurice; 02-17-2010, 03:21 AM.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Hi Adam,
                                Originally posted by Uncle Jack View Post
                                Do you have documented evidence that Leo Taxil was in London at the time of the murders?
                                What for ?

                                Amitiés,
                                David

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X