Having realised that, on the whole, serial killers do not start their murderous career with murder and mutilation, but with cruelty to animals, fire starting and sexual assaults.
And assuming that the ripper was 20 to 40 years old, because of both witness statements and profiler's opinions on the killers age.
So, say JtR was convicted of the above listed offenses from the age of 10 years onwards, that is 1878 if he was 20 and 1858 if he were 40.
So surely if someone were to spend ages rooting through all the court conviction records from 1858 to 1878, for, perhaps the south of England (assuming the killer didnt move from the north and that he wasn't a foreigner) for sexual assaults, fire starting, or animal cruelty.
Would that not MAYBE throw up JtR's name along with many others?
Iam unable to work at the moment owing to sickness and my days are emtpy and tedious, so it isn't a question of time.
It is simly a question of effort, and has anyone done this before?
thanks
doris,
and thanks for your kind greetings
And assuming that the ripper was 20 to 40 years old, because of both witness statements and profiler's opinions on the killers age.
So, say JtR was convicted of the above listed offenses from the age of 10 years onwards, that is 1878 if he was 20 and 1858 if he were 40.
So surely if someone were to spend ages rooting through all the court conviction records from 1858 to 1878, for, perhaps the south of England (assuming the killer didnt move from the north and that he wasn't a foreigner) for sexual assaults, fire starting, or animal cruelty.
Would that not MAYBE throw up JtR's name along with many others?
Iam unable to work at the moment owing to sickness and my days are emtpy and tedious, so it isn't a question of time.
It is simly a question of effort, and has anyone done this before?
thanks
doris,
and thanks for your kind greetings
Comment