Originally posted by DarkPassenger
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Murder Dates and Times
Collapse
X
-
Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
-
It could also reflect someone else's schedule, say for example he lived with a family of observant Jews and worked in their family shop but did not himself feel the need to stay in Friday nights or early Saturday mornings.
Add in the fact that he doubtless tried to entrap more women than he actually killed and you can fit in just about any scenario, unfortunately.
Comment
-
Unortunatley it appears that theory is really the best we can arrive at and it falls down on many hundreds of opinions and interpretations of the facts.
I do feel the time and dates are significant however it is a dead end in that we will never know for real. It is a pity the records are so poorly kept and so much cnnot be agreed upon.A Violet Plucked From Mother's Grave
Comment
-
We put ourselves in a box if we think "regularly employed man."
Taking a page from Odell, both Chaim Bermant and Charles Van Onselen wondered aloud if the killings were tied to Jewish holidays, with a mad maniac "cleansing" the world according to ancient precepts. There was a pattern to the dates at first, but it didn't continue.
Originally posted by Supe View PostAs it stands, Jack was clearly a creature of the night...
RoySink the Bismark
Comment
-
Hi Roy,
Yes but the pattern of dates did continue, I am not about to repeat the thirty nine theory here, but just use the dates of the C5.
Polly Nichols 31st of the 8th month=39
Annie Chapman killed on the 8th of september 31+8 =39
Eddowes/Stride killed on the 30th of the 9th month.
The month of october was free of more killings, however the next date [ millers court ] occured on the same pattern ie.. 30+9 [ Eddowes/stride30th , kelly 9th november]
I am not alone in suggesting most serial killers work to a pattern, either in choice of victim, or displaying of the victims, and yes the dates of the murders.
Regards Richard.
Comment
-
Hi Ronnie.
The number 'Thirty nine' has many meanings, it has significance in Masonic ritual, also it has religious meaning involving the striking of christ and Roman policy.
The number thirty nine is not only intresting in the coincidental factor, but when added to other 39s in the Ripper case, become fascinating.
As you are intrested[ many see it as a absurd] try a few more.
The victims names when their letters are counted, make thirty nine, ie Tabram, Nichols, Chapman, Long liz, Eddowes, Kelly, [ Stride was known as that in the area].
Coincedence possibly?
There were two letters written sent to the police/press refering to that number'I live at number 39 Cutler street, and i wish to give myself up' , and another one sent refering to hanbury street , with the number 39 on it.
Also over the main entrance to the Victoria home, wher three intresting players in the case resided at the same time that is , Hutchinson, Daniel Barnet, and the strange Joseph fleming, you can cllearly see 39-41 Commercial street,
Also where did the last victim life?
26 Dorset street ..room 13 =39
What day did Barnett move out into lodgings.
Answer one calander month after the double event,30th october. and when did Mary die the 9th.
And to cap it all we must not forget the thirty nine stab wounds that the 39 year old Tabram endured.
The regulars on this site are now giving massive sighs..... however its all there coincidence or not.
Regards Richard.
Comment
-
The 39 theory. Had not heard of that, Richard. Thank you.
Here is an except from London’s East End, Point of Arrival by Chaim Bermant, New York, 1975
…some Jewish observers must have followed the pattern of murders with unease, for there was something significant about their incidence. The first murder took place on 7 August, the second on 31 August, the third on 7 September, the fourth and fifth on 30 September.
7 August coincided with the eve of the first Ellul, the month preceding the Jewish New Year and the Ten Days of Penitence, and, as such, it has been traditionally treated as a month of supplication and penitence. The doom-laden sound of the Shofar (ram’s horn) is heard during the morning service to warn of the approach of the Day of Judgement (which is another name for the New Year). A crazed fanatic, who may have consorted with prostitutes and was obsessed with his sense of guilt, might have ventured out on the eve of Ellul on his deadly mission. There is nothing in Jewish law to sanction such an act and everything to condemn it, but an insane man needs no sanctions.
31 August coincided with the 24th of Ellul, a point in the month when the pious rise at dawn to say Selichot, special penitential prayers on the immediate approach of the New Year. They are days of deep contrition and the worshipper, with clenched fist against his heart, goes through a prolonged confessional:
We have trespassed, we have betrayed, we have robbed, we have slandered, we have committed iniquity, and have done wickedly, we have acted presumptuously, we have committed violence, we have framed falsehood…
And so on through every conceivable form of trespass. To a sane man it was a means of correction, but to an insane man…?
The following week passed without incident.
The New Year and the Day of Atonement, which follows ten days later, are the most sacred days of the Jewish calendar and are known together as the Solemn Days. The New Year celebrations continue over two days. The first day fell on 6 September, and it passed quietly, as did the second, but some hours after the close of the evening service, on 7 September, Annie Chapman was found in Hanbury Street…
A dreadful pattern was emerging and it seemed as if a Jew, overwhelmed by perverted religious passions, had taken it upon himself to act as an avenging angel in the name of the Lord.
Had the murder at the close of New Year's Day been followed by another on the most solemn day of all, the Day of Atonement, the picture would have been complete, and there would have been little doubt that Jack the Ripper was a Jew. ...
The Day of Atonement came and went without incident.
End Quote. As Mr. Bermant points out, the apparent pattern stopped. The author does not advocate any particular suspect theory, but his is the most succinct rendition of the above scenario.
RoySink the Bismark
Comment
-
Although it would seem the only thing that some can conclude about Jack based on his attributed kill dates is that he killed "at night"...its not likely a profile trait. Annie was killed at daybreak by the way...and Mary's TOD may have been incorrecly estimated...allowing for a possibility that she was killed in daylight as well.
So theres potentially 40% of The Canonical Group that may not have been killed in complete darkness.
If the man works from noon until midnight....he can kill and sleep before his next shift...if the man kills on weekends or holidays attached to a weekend, he may not have had to work the following day. And when a murder "streak includes not one Weeknight kill ever...outside the above parameters...not one kill from no later than the 9th of the month until at least the 30th of the same month, and there are no attempted attacks during those "quiet" times that were assumed by the authorities to be failed "Jack" attacks...you have substance for a pattern and for restricted access to the area in the down times.
If he doesn't kill ever during that monthly period...in any month he killed in, ...then logically one answer is he couldn't.
Although I'm quite sure a post will follow telling us what Jack likely does regardless of the evidence....so stay tuned.
Best regards.
Comment
-
Originally posted by perrymason View PostIf he doesn't kill ever during that monthly period...in any month he killed in, ...then logically one answer is he couldn't.
He simply failed to find a suitable opportunity;
He didn't feel like killing;
He was lying low.
None of the above 3 are mutually exclusive, and in fact you can add "he couldn't" to the list, too. All of which boils down to:"Jack went out on some nights, intending to kill, but only succeeding on a few occasions - most of the time, he never found a suitable opportunity. On some nights, Jack couldn't go out - for domestic/health reasons, or perhaps because of work commitments. At other times he didn't feel the urge to go out anyway."If you substitute "Jack" with "I" and "kill" with "going to the pub", you'll find that the above rather mundane state of affairs applies in everyday life. Now, a person might end up in a position where they can't go to the pub - illness, abstinence, being banned by the landlord etc - but, more often than not, their absence from a pub at any given time could be down to any one, or a combination, of the above.
In short, there are several eminently non-mysterious reasons which could explain why Jack only succeeded in killing on the "canonical" nights, and there's no reason on earth to suppose that there was only ONE consistent reason for it.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostThe other logical answers are:
He simply failed to find a suitable opportunity;
He didn't feel like killing;
He was lying low.
None of the above 3 are mutually exclusive, and in fact you can add "he couldn't" to the list, too. All of which boils down to:"Jack went out on some nights, intending to kill, but only succeeding on a few occasions - most of the time, he never found a suitable opportunity. On some nights, Jack couldn't go out - for domestic/health reasons, or perhaps because of work commitments. At other times he didn't feel the urge to go out anyway."If you substitute "Jack" with "I" and "kill" with "going to the pub", you'll find that the above rather mundane state of affairs applies in everyday life. Now, a person might end up in a position where they can't go to the pub - illness, abstinence, being banned by the landlord etc - but, more often than not, their absence from a pub at any given time could be down to any one, or a combination, of the above.
In short, there are several eminently non-mysterious reasons which could explain why Jack only succeeded in killing on the "canonical" nights, and there's no reason on earth to suppose that there was only ONE consistent reason for it.
Sure...he may have taken ill too....but does that explain a fixed 10 day kill window either? He only gets sick on the days he doesn't usually kill anyway?
You can say that the dates and that fixed 10 day kill window are meaningless if you like,....but I think evidence of potential pattern is never meaningless myself.
And one very logical explanation for them not finding him in between kills... is that he wasn't where they were looking for him during those periods.
Cheers Gareth.
Comment
-
Phases of Moon
For what its worth:
Nichols 8/31 -- half moon on 8/29; moonless on 9/6 waning crescent
Chapman 9/8/88 -- moonless on 9/6; half moon on 9/12 waxing crescent
Stride/Eddowes 9/30--half moon 9/28; moonless on 10/5 waning crescent
Kelly 11/9--moonless 11/4; half moon Nov 10 waxing crescent
United Kingdom 1888 – Calendar with British holidays. Yearly calendar showing months for the year 1888. Calendars – online and print friendly – for any year and month
Each time there was a little moonlight but not a lot.Last edited by diana; 02-23-2009, 12:44 AM.
Comment
-
Annie Chapman killed on the 8th of september 31+8 =39
The month of october was free of more killings, however the next date [ millers court ] occured on the same pattern ie.. 30+9 [ Eddowes/stride30th , kelly 9th november]
So there are only 2 dates where the month and the day add up to 39 and if you commit an act roughly one month apart from each other, that's not exactly a coincidence beyond imagining. But I understand that people who want to see patterns have to STREEEETCH to make those patterns emerge sometimes.
Let all Oz be agreed;
I need a better class of flying monkeys.
Comment
Comment