If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Thanks for that Glenn. There's also references to Chisholm and others (who have thought Kelly a non-ripper job) in an interview with SPE in the casebook.
That's true, John.
It shall also be noted that this is also shortly mentioned in Evan's & Gainey's book The Lodger, where there is a reference to Chisholms theory and where such thoughts are discussed.
All the best
The Swedes are the Men that Will not Be Blamed for Nothing
Just an update that the main Casebook's "Victims" section is now fully integrated into the wiki project, just as we've done with "Witnesses". Hopefully this will allow us to keep these pages more up-to-date with the latest finds, changes, etc.
Some of you may (or may not) have noticed that after an initial 6-month rush, little has been done on the Wiki for a few weeks now.
I feel that many potential entries (senior police officials for example) are too complicated for me personally, but there must be others out there who have a better grip on them than I do.
I know I've been blitzing it somewhat and it's great that others (you know who you are) have produced great stuff, but I'm a bit spent with new book stuff and work.
With that in mind, there are over 40 users registered to contribute. Would anybody else care to muscle in on the 'wanted' pages? Or anything?
John
Last edited by John Bennett; 04-30-2009, 10:06 PM.
Yes, I had noticed that there was a bit of a lull following the enormous amount of work you had put into the project. I do hope to contribute further in the future, though I'd better not try to predict when.
One thought I had was that trying to produce a complete article is a much more forbidding task than contributing individual bits of information. If it would be acceptable to have some lists of rough notes where pages don't yet exist, it might make it easier for people to add new pieces of information as they come to light, without having to worry about composing a whole article.
The easiest way to find out what is needed is to go to to THE WANTED LIST. This lists all links in the Wiki that have yet to have a page made for them.
I did start John McCarthy a while back and haven't got round to adding to it.
There are several other articles that are very brief and will need developing, but as they have been effectively started, they will not appear on the wanted list. They are:
Walter Dew
Walter Andrews
George Bagster Phillips
John Pizer
Francis Camps
Israel Schwartz
Thomas Horrocks Openshaw
Lyttleton Forbes Winslow
William Sedgewick Saunders
For those who refer to the Wiki categories pages, you may note that the list of entries are jumbled up at the moment - either they are listed alphabetically by first letter, or by surname.
I am currently correcting the category list so that all named entries are sorted by surname, thus making it a bit easier to find people, especially witnesses (of which there are now 170-odd) and police officials (who are often referred to by surname in any case).
Sorry if this is all a bit confusing, but it should all be sorted soon.
I feel that many potential entries (senior police officials for example) are too complicated for me personally, but there must be others out there who have a better grip on them than I do.
John
The wanted pages of the Wiki are now mostly made up of Senior Police officials - Anderson, Swanson, Reid etc. I haven't touched them yet and it's a bit daunting, to be honest.
If anybody can put in a nice entry for any these folks, it would be great. If you are a bit iffy about wiki coding, that shouldn't be a problem. Send me a doc. file of text and I can transfer it into the format, sources and all. The Stephen White page was done this way (thanks Rob C!).
I thought I'd just clear some outstanding entries before launching into other things like big suspects...
Comment