Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Time Of Death

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • There is such a thread Al but it’s virtually impossible to get a decent, honest answer on the subject and believe me I’ve tried. Put simply, Fishy claimed to be able to rebut Simon Wood’s published research showing the falsehoods in the story. I asked Fishy to present his rebuttals over a dozen times and not once did he answer a direct question or produce a shred of evidence. Simon Wood himself even offered to discuss the subject with Fishy via pm’s but unsurprisingly he didn’t take Simon up the the offer. It’s impossible to come up with a sensible suggestion apart from ignoring him and letting him post anything unchallenged which is probably the best idea.

    And also ignoring the pointless, childish, content-free snipes from his supporter too.
    Regards

    Sir Herlock Sholmes.

    “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Fiver View Post

      Walter Sickert was on vacation in France at the time.
      Wow.

      You call that proof?

      My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
        guess that it was simply a story created by Walter which possibly morphed over the years with re-telling. It even reads like a work of fiction.
        Agreed
        Only Walter was in a position to make it up .
        Why he did so though is the mystery
        You can lead a horse to water.....

        Comment


        • Originally posted by packers stem View Post

          Agreed
          Only Walter was in a position to make it up .
          Why he did so though is the mystery
          Maybe he just liked being ‘the man who knew?’ He was certainly eccentric, especially in his later years I think.
          Regards

          Sir Herlock Sholmes.

          “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

          Comment


          • Maybe he just liked being ‘the man who knew?’ He was certainly eccentric, especially in his later years I think.
            Indeed when it comes to Walter Sickert people usually tend to just.... ''think'' .
            'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

            Comment


            • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

              Indeed when it comes to Walter Sickert people usually tend to just.... ''think'' .
              You might consider ‘thinking’ a bad habit but most of us don’t. It’s an improvement on merely accepting something as true without a shred of evidence. Just because a story exists and two people have told it we can’t just assume that it’s true. The normal method is to look at the background and check the facts. If we find one untruth it raises a doubt. Two untruths raise greater doubts. When you get to 5 or so we are on safe grounds in dismissing the story especially when consider how implausible the story is in the first place. The Knight/Sickert story has alarm bells going off with every sentence. It’s an invention with bits of truth in there to keep people interested. Luckily 99.9% look at the proper research that’s been done and recognise it for what it is....an obvious fantasy.
              Regards

              Sir Herlock Sholmes.

              “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

              Comment


              • You might consider ‘thinking’ a bad habit but most of us don’t. It’s an improvement on merely accepting something as true without a shred of evidence. Just because a story exists and two people have told it we can’t just assume that it’s true. The normal method is to look at the background and check the facts. If we find one untruth it raises a doubt. Two untruths raise greater doubts. When you get to 5 or so we are on safe grounds in dismissing the story especially when consider how implausible the story is in the first place. The Knight/Sickert story has alarm bells going off with every sentence. It’s an invention with bits of truth in there to keep people interested. Luckily 99.9% look at the proper research that’s been done and recognise it for what it is....an obvious fantasy.
                Only in your own fantasy world where its the norm to ignore whats to hard to understand or interpret, especially when its been confirmed by one or more sources , the rest of us real researches know better.
                'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

                Comment


                • Sorry, you have to be a complete brainlet to believe the Masonic conspiracy rubbish.

                  Comment


                  • Suspect Theory spamming is not allowed.
                    - turning every thread you post on into a debate/argument about your suspect theory.
                    If you’d like to argue your suspect theory please start new threads and keep such posts in the Suspects section of the boards.

                    Thanks

                    JM

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Harry D View Post
                      Sorry, you have to be a complete brainlet to believe the Masonic conspiracy rubbish.
                      brainlet. lol! and so true. the boards are spammed to death recently on all this fantasy crap-royal conspiracy, masonic, police. we even have now spirit world nonsense?!?

                      It almost makes one wish for the Diary Delusion
                      Last edited by Abby Normal; 10-17-2019, 01:10 PM.
                      "Is all that we see or seem
                      but a dream within a dream?"

                      -Edgar Allan Poe


                      "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                      quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                      -Frederick G. Abberline

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

                        Only in your own fantasy world where its the norm to ignore whats to hard to understand or interpret, especially when its been confirmed by one or more sources , the rest of us real researches know better.
                        Regards

                        Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                        “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Harry D View Post
                          Sorry, you have to be a complete brainlet to believe the Masonic conspiracy rubbish.
                          Regards

                          Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                          “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by DJA View Post

                            Wow.

                            You call that proof?
                            Funny that being in France seems to be an excuse for being unavailable for the kills in London,... didn't seem to deter MacNaughten that one of his suspects was in Jail at the time. The fact is that the Ripper may well have come from France in the form of Vasiliev.

                            The very first books ever published about the crimes, the first being in late Nov/Dec 1888 I believe in New York..self published If I recall, named Vasiliev as the culprit.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X