Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - by c.d. 6 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson? - by Wickerman 13 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson? - by DJA 52 minutes ago.
Non-Fiction: The New Jack the Ripper A-Z - by packers stem 1 hour and 4 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - by packers stem 1 hour and 9 minutes ago.
Non-Fiction: The New Jack the Ripper A-Z - by Wickerman 1 hour and 13 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Motive, Method and Madness: Geoprofile of Jack the Ripper reveals Tabram and Nichols connection. - (76 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: distances between kills.odd - (15 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson? - (7 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - (6 posts)
Levy, Jacob: Jacob the Ripper - (5 posts)
Torso Killings: JtR failed amputation. Torso killer was successful. - (5 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Suspects > Hutchinson, George

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #411  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:18 PM
Simon Wood Simon Wood is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,604
Default

Hi Jon,

How did I know you were going to say that?

Regards,

Simon
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #412  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:22 PM
Wickerman Wickerman is online now
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,878
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Rogan View Post
Doesn't Hutchinson's statement confirm that it took place where he usually slept?

"After I left the court I walked about all night, as the place where I usually sleep was closed. I came in as soon as it opened in the morning"
No, what Hutch is saying is. The place where I usually sleep was closed, I came in here when it opened in the morning.
Friday morning apparently was his first stay at the Victoria Home. His previous lodgings (where he usually slept) are not given.
__________________
Regards, Jon S.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #413  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:25 PM
Wickerman Wickerman is online now
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,878
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Wood View Post
Hi Jon,

How did I know you were going to say that?

Regards,

Simon
Hi Simon.

All you have to do is compare like-for-like stories to see just how inaccurate some of their reporting was.
__________________
Regards, Jon S.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #414  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:35 PM
Wickerman Wickerman is online now
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,878
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abby Normal View Post
Hi DK
Exactly! where is this star witness Hutch? the one who definitely saw the mans face!?! "They, however, state that they only saw his back",
So why do you think 'peaked-cap' man was the Ripper?
Aren't you in the same position?
__________________
Regards, Jon S.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #415  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:37 PM
Ben Ben is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,843
Default

Thanks, Caz! Good to see you here.

I would respectfully differ on the subject of Hutchinson’s perceived chances of avoiding identification if he remained silent. If a chance encounter with Lewis on the streets of Spitalfields had resulted in him being hauled before the cops, he would have been at a far greater disadvantage without having first a) established himself preemptively as a witness, and b) created a false trail in the form of surly Jewish Jack.

There is also an important secondary consideration that his decision to come forward owed as much to a desire to lay a false trail as it did to self-preservation. There is ample evidence from the double event to suggest that the killer sought to exploit anti-Jewish sentiment, and if Hutchinson was the killer, his Astrakhan creation may be seen as a logical extension of those earlier efforts. If, as you say, there was nothing in the form of fingerprints, DNA etc to incriminate him, he could have killed both birds with one stone, secure in the assumption that he was unlikely to get buckled as a result.

As for Lewis and Hutchinson being able (or otherwise) to recognise Wideawke and Astrakhan respectively, I have no problem with either. If Hutchinson had stated simply that the Astrakhan suspect had worn dark clothes and a hat, I would have no trouble reconciling this with his professed ability to recognise the man again.

What isn’t so plausible, or realistically possible, is a claim to have remembered so much intricate detail within such a tight time frame, and in those much discussed merge light available.

Even if Hutchinson had gone nowhere near the Town Hall on 12th November, his decision to come forward the moment the inquest closed is almost certainly not coincidence, since it “coincided” with the very moment the opportunity for a public airing of his evidence - which would have entailed a face-off with Lewis - had passed for good.

It would have been only reasonable for him to assume that anyone who entered the court on the night of the murder was more likely than not to appear at the inquest, and if he knew full well that one of them had seen a wideawake-wearing man staring at the court entrance, why expect anything other than the public disclosure of such a detail?

As far as the rent goes, her behaviour with Blotchy from 11.45 until at least an hour thereafter is wholly inconsistent with pressing anxiety over imminent rent collection.

All the best,
Ben

Last edited by Ben : 07-18-2018 at 02:45 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #416  
Old 07-18-2018, 02:46 PM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickerman View Post
Hutch is a popular witness to have a go at. One reason why so many jump on the "lets get Hutch" bandwagon is for the very reason's I have given before. Nothing offered by previous authors is satisfactory. Arguments are weak.
So out pops another author with another angle to try incriminate him.

It doesn't matter how many members or authors try to stick it to Hutch, none of them can agree on the basic's.
None can even agree on what he may have lied about.

Looks to me like his accusers are thrashing around treading water until someone comes up with a theory that is not full of holes.
Nah. Its because his story and circs are full of holes.
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #417  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:04 PM
Simon Wood Simon Wood is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,604
Default

Hi Jon,

Here's an account of Hutchinson corroborating his own story.

It's from the Echo [London], 14th November 1888

Name:  ECHO 14 NOV 1888.JPG
Views: 92
Size:  53.2 KB

Regards,

Simon
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #418  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:07 PM
Ben Ben is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,843
Default

Hi again, Caz.

Quote:
Did Hutchinson look Jewish, Ben? Or did he resemble Kosminski in any way?
I would strongly suspect not in the former case, but then nor did William Grant Grainger, who was also apparently identified by Lawende as the man from Church Passage, in 1895 if I recall correctly. The gentile (if not so gentle!) Grainger may not have been a correct identification either, but his age and height at least recall the 30ish, sailor-like, “rather rough and shabby” man originally described.

Certainly there was nothing in the original description to suggest a Jew, less still one in his early twenties. Ditto the broad-shouldered bruiser described by Schwartz.

I would suggest it was nigh on impossible to operate entirely unseen in those crowded streets, even in the wee hours, and I also think there’s enough broad consistency in many of the reported sightings - fleeting though they have been - to infer that they all saw the same man.

Quote:
If he did allow himself to be seen by one or more witnesses, that would seem to favour someone of "foreign" or Jewish appearance.
No, quite the contrary.

The vast majority of witnesses described suspects with nothing remotely to suggest a foreign or Jewish appearance. Apart from Hutchinson himself, only Chapman described a “foreigner”, and she didn’t even see his face.

Cheers,
Ben

Last edited by Ben : 07-18-2018 at 03:23 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #419  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:09 PM
Simon Wood Simon Wood is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,604
Default

Here's another.

The last sentence is the most important.

Belfast Newsletter, 14th November 1888

Name:  BELFAST NEWS LETTER 14 NOV 1888.JPG
Views: 95
Size:  93.3 KB
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #420  
Old 07-18-2018, 03:23 PM
Wickerman Wickerman is online now
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,878
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Wood View Post
Hi Jon,

Here's an account of Hutchinson corroborating his own story.

It's from the Echo [London], 14th November 1888

Attachment 18720

Regards,

Simon
Hi Simon.

I don't see how you can read it that way. Who was Hutchinson confirming his own story to?
__________________
Regards, Jon S.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.