The Babysitter/Snow Killer

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sdreid
    Commissioner
    • Feb 2008
    • 4956

    #76
    Originally posted by sdreid View Post
    Kenneth Hanson's legal team, to no avail, also tried to implicate Gacy for the Chicago 1955 Matinée Murders.
    Gacy was only 13 at the time so that made the claim quite dubious right at the start up.
    This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

    Stan Reid

    Comment

    • sdreid
      Commissioner
      • Feb 2008
      • 4956

      #77
      Just recently it was revealed that a feature film about Gacy is in the planning stages.
      This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

      Stan Reid

      Comment

      • sdreid
        Commissioner
        • Feb 2008
        • 4956

        #78
        I don't see anything on IMDb about it yet so who knows about the new Gacy film. If it comes to fruition, hopefully it will reverse the downhill trend of John Wayne Gacy movies.
        This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

        Stan Reid

        Comment

        • Ausgirl
          Sergeant
          • Jul 2011
          • 556

          #79
          Good thought, re the Wed/Sundays maybe being church sessions.

          Thing is, if this guy needed to use church as an excuse to be out in his van or whatever, then how'd he explain away the time he clearly spent with the kids in the days/weeks to follow? And where'd he keep them - at work?

          Really strange case. Thanks for posting on it.

          Also - LOL at the Michael Moore experiment. Even if it is a bit scary.
          Last edited by Ausgirl; 09-18-2013, 06:44 AM.

          Comment

          • sdreid
            Commissioner
            • Feb 2008
            • 4956

            #80
            Originally posted by Ausgirl View Post
            Thing is, if this guy needed to use church as an excuse to be out in his van or whatever, then how'd he explain away the time he clearly spent with the kids in the days/weeks to follow? And where'd he keep them - at work?
            All I can think is:

            1-He had a very secure room where he could keep the kids locked up.
            2-He was unemployed in some fashion.
            3-He was self employed in an occupation where he didn't need to account for his whereabouts.
            4-He had an accomplice so they could watch the children in shifts.
            This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

            Stan Reid

            Comment

            • sdreid
              Commissioner
              • Feb 2008
              • 4956

              #81
              Originally posted by sdreid View Post
              2-He was unemployed in some fashion.
              In some fashion perhaps meaning involved in some sort of seasonal work.
              This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

              Stan Reid

              Comment

              • sdreid
                Commissioner
                • Feb 2008
                • 4956

                #82
                Either way, it would seem that he must have watched them at all times or he was in some isolated area where they could not be heard yelling for help.
                This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                Stan Reid

                Comment

                • sdreid
                  Commissioner
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 4956

                  #83
                  Originally posted by sdreid View Post
                  In some fashion perhaps meaning involved in some sort of seasonal work.
                  Since all the murders occurred in the cold months, that's a major theory.
                  This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                  Stan Reid

                  Comment

                  • sdreid
                    Commissioner
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 4956

                    #84
                    Maybe the guy was in the snow removal business.
                    This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                    Stan Reid

                    Comment

                    • sdreid
                      Commissioner
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 4956

                      #85
                      Originally posted by sdreid View Post
                      2-He was unemployed in some fashion.
                      That doesn't necessarily mean that he was receiving unemployment compensation though.
                      This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                      Stan Reid

                      Comment

                      • sdreid
                        Commissioner
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 4956

                        #86
                        He may have been supported by family.
                        This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                        Stan Reid

                        Comment

                        • sdreid
                          Commissioner
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 4956

                          #87
                          That situation might fit one of the suspects.
                          This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                          Stan Reid

                          Comment

                          • sdreid
                            Commissioner
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 4956

                            #88
                            Like other unsolved cases, we seem to continue to add new suspects but rarely eliminate any.
                            Last edited by sdreid; 05-01-2014, 04:50 AM.
                            This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                            Stan Reid

                            Comment

                            • sdreid
                              Commissioner
                              • Feb 2008
                              • 4956

                              #89
                              According to the Wiki article, Gacy's DNA doesn't match though.
                              This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                              Stan Reid

                              Comment

                              • sdreid
                                Commissioner
                                • Feb 2008
                                • 4956

                                #90
                                Originally posted by sdreid View Post
                                Like other unsolved cases, we seem to continue to add new suspects but rarely eliminate any.
                                Gacy is eliminated in my book though.
                                This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                                Stan Reid

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X