i have a new theory that rules out dr.tumblerty. i believe the murderers of the five canonical didn’t stop all together after Kelly. as it was noted that the mutilations started out as slight abdominal mutilations as on Nichols and increased in degrees ending in Kelly being unrecognizable. so if the ripper went to that degree with five victims why stop there? Why not say that on September the 9th 1889 when the pinchin street torso was found that that may have been another victim of the ripper? There are clues that point to the ripper
1.severe abdominal mutilations
2.the victim was killed on sept 8 1889 the one year anniversary of Chapman
i think the killer might have killed again to relive his murders of the previous year and maybe the degree of mutilation was upped again to making the victim unrecognizable. I believe if the ripper did kill another that he wouldn’t just stop at the degree of mutilation found with the woman killed in No.13 millers court but that he would advance again to more mutilations as in disemboweling his victims and mutilating them. i believe there was one report of the womb missing but this is not very likely. This theory needs some research and i invite anyone who would like to help me prove or disprove this
but on the other hand if it is related to the Whitehall torso of oct 3rd 1888 it cant be related to the ripper murders because the ripper wouldn’t go from that degree of mutilation to a lesser degree as that of Nichols but if it isn’t related to the Whitehall torso then it may then be related.
1.severe abdominal mutilations
2.the victim was killed on sept 8 1889 the one year anniversary of Chapman
i think the killer might have killed again to relive his murders of the previous year and maybe the degree of mutilation was upped again to making the victim unrecognizable. I believe if the ripper did kill another that he wouldn’t just stop at the degree of mutilation found with the woman killed in No.13 millers court but that he would advance again to more mutilations as in disemboweling his victims and mutilating them. i believe there was one report of the womb missing but this is not very likely. This theory needs some research and i invite anyone who would like to help me prove or disprove this
but on the other hand if it is related to the Whitehall torso of oct 3rd 1888 it cant be related to the ripper murders because the ripper wouldn’t go from that degree of mutilation to a lesser degree as that of Nichols but if it isn’t related to the Whitehall torso then it may then be related.
Comment