I see that Julie Smith, who wrote the Axeman novel, worked for the San Francisco Chronicle in 1969 when Robert Graysmith was there and during the Zodiac era. That place must have been a nursery for serial killer writers.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tales of the New Orleans Axeman
Collapse
X
-
Robert Gray's myth
Originally posted by sdreid View PostI see that Julie Smith, who wrote the Axeman novel, worked for the San Francisco Chronicle in 1969 when Robert Graysmith was there and during the Zodiac era. That place must have been a nursery for serial killer writers.
Yes indeed she did and it is worth mentioning that, unlike some of her rather more well known contempories, she had the honesty, the good grace and the class, to admit that her book, while based on her research into an actual serial killer case, was in fact a work of fiction and literary imagination!!!
Best wishes,
Zodiac.
P.S. By the way, "The Big Yellow Book" still makes an excellent door-stop!!!And thus I clothe my naked villainy
With old odd ends, stol'n forth of holy writ;
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil.
Comment
-
Zodiac Books.
Originally posted by sdreid View PostHi Zodiac:
What is your favorite Zodiac book? I don't have too much of a problem with Graysmith's book or at least not the first 80% of it.
I don't think that I actually have a book on "Zodiac" that I could call my favourite, as they all are flawed to a greater or lesser extent. If you've already read the "Big Yellow Book" and its sequel "Zodiac Unmasked" then I would recommend getting hold of "This is the Zodiac Speaking: Into the Mind of a Serial Killer." by Michael D. Kelleher and David Van Nuys. It provides a very different, and imho much more credible, analysis of the killer. Another plus point for it is that, almost alone amongst books on Zodiac, it does not offer up a prime suspect and claim to have solved the case!!!
Books on Zodiac are imho at about the same point as books on JTR were maybe 20 or more years ago. Graysmith would be somewhat akin to Stephen Knight, in so much as his book is probably the first one the subject that many of us read and indeed was the one that got us so interested in it that we wanted to know more. Also in the sense that while much of the information in the books is untrue and has been thoroughly debunked it remains by far the most popular version of events among the general public and is, of course, perfect for the Hollywood movie treatment!!!
Two very good links for you,
Best wishes,
Zodiac.And thus I clothe my naked villainy
With old odd ends, stol'n forth of holy writ;
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil.
Comment
-
Thanks for the info Zodiac. I have not read Graysmith's second book and only have Hodel's for my other "Zodiac" book.
BTW, by a slight margin, my favorite Zodiac movie is not the 2007 Graysmith centered film. It's the Alexander Bulkley directed The Zodiac from 2005.Last edited by sdreid; 02-05-2012, 05:12 AM.This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.
Stan Reid
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zodiac View PostIf you've already read the "Big Yellow Book" and its sequel "Zodiac Unmasked" then I would recommend getting hold of "This is the Zodiac Speaking: Into the Mind of a Serial Killer." by Michael D. Kelleher and David Van Nuys.This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.
Stan Reid
Comment
-
Originally posted by sdreid View PostBTW, by a slight margin, my favorite Zodiac movie is not the 2007 Graysmith centered film. It's the Alexander Bulkley directed The Zodiac from 2005.This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.
Stan Reid
Comment
-
-
I am currently reading a book about the Villisca Ax Murders and the Tex/La ax murders are mentioned there; a case that is also sometimes brought up in connection with these killings.This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.
Stan Reid
Comment
Comment