Hi Stan,
The only reference I have to the NO Axeman (note the 'e'...) is by a bloke called Henry Lester whose article is included in 'Murders And Mysteries', a collection of stuff by John Canning. Lester states more or less categorically that the axeman was well into going for young women - he'd bop their husbands first and then go for broke against the ladies. Seems a bit odd that he apparently broke into properties in which husband and wife were a-bed. Why not reduce the risk of coming up against a Bluto of a husband and go for the ladies when they were alone? Or was he into risk-taking?
Do you think the attacks were by one man and one man only, or were there copy-cats?
Cheers,
Graham.
The only reference I have to the NO Axeman (note the 'e'...) is by a bloke called Henry Lester whose article is included in 'Murders And Mysteries', a collection of stuff by John Canning. Lester states more or less categorically that the axeman was well into going for young women - he'd bop their husbands first and then go for broke against the ladies. Seems a bit odd that he apparently broke into properties in which husband and wife were a-bed. Why not reduce the risk of coming up against a Bluto of a husband and go for the ladies when they were alone? Or was he into risk-taking?
Do you think the attacks were by one man and one man only, or were there copy-cats?
Cheers,
Graham.
Comment