The documentary certainly cast a great deal of doubt on much of the "scientific" evidence and it seems a flimsy thread on which to hang a man.
However, the most compelling evidence is surely the pyjama jacket. Only two possibilities can explain this away, viz:
1) Crippen was guilty, or
2) Dew was a liar.
Any thoughts, casebookers?
Regards,
Steve.
However, the most compelling evidence is surely the pyjama jacket. Only two possibilities can explain this away, viz:
1) Crippen was guilty, or
2) Dew was a liar.
Any thoughts, casebookers?
Regards,
Steve.
Comment