If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I'm not sure that new members appear there instantly. The most recent new member doesn't, either, for example. There may be some sort of induction period, perhaps to prevent spam posts.
I sincerely doubt that there could be a mass murder of that calibre where it wouldn't be infamous. Therefore the question is irrelevant in so far as whether she would be released if the crime wasn't so sensational. By its definition mass murder IS sensational. So do I think she would have been released if she had participated in any other mass slaughter of people? No.
I'll tell you what, find me a case of where anyone else participated in the mass slaughter of human beings, willfully wielding the knife on at least one of them who has been paroled from prison and I'll possibly rethink allowing her out.
But as far as I am concerned, a mass murderer deserves life in prison. Actually they deserve a bullet in the brain, but barring that, life in prison will do.
Let all Oz be agreed;
I need a better class of flying monkeys.
If you participate in a crime in which people lose their lives you are held equally responsible by the law. She was not only convicted of one murder but also of conspiracy in murder.
Bye bye for life. She willingly participated in the actions that cost the lives of half a dozen people. She should be glad she's alive and not ripped to shreds like her victims are and stop whining about poor unfortunate her.
Let all Oz be agreed;
I need a better class of flying monkeys.
I didn't say you should stop whining. I said she should stop whining. And I feel people who defend cold blooded murdering bitches are people who lack sympathy for those who truly deserve it: their victims.
Let all Oz be agreed;
I need a better class of flying monkeys.
People do change. Unless someone murders you before you have the chance to.
As I said, I frankly don't care if she's changed into a candidate for sainthood. The calibre of her crimes requires that she pay with her life. She can do her saintly work there with the people who will most benefit from it.
Let all Oz be agreed;
I need a better class of flying monkeys.
People do change. Unless someone murders you before you have the chance to.
Nice one!
As I said, I frankly don't care if she's changed into a candidate for sainthood. The calibre of her crimes requires that she pay with her life. She can do her saintly work there with the people who will most benefit from it.
That's an option.
I accept your opinion, although mine is different.
One can deny her parole, but it's simply unfair to deny her remorse, understanding and real shame.
Comment