Originally posted by Jon Guy
View Post
At any rate, this is why the analogy fails: all of the hooligans were UK citizens. In the case of Trump's ban, most known terrorists have not been citizens of the banned countries. Nationality is not very relevant to the fight against terror.
Don`t you think this ban took the pressure of the British and European Intelligence agencies ?
I`m not sure how you came to that conclusion.
There are border controls and there are the security forces.
Two different things.
If you still maintain what I quoted you on above, then no: that ban did not take the pressure off the British and European Intelligence agencies, because border controls and security forces are two different things. Now you are saying something different again.
So, thanks to President Trump fulfilling his election promises in record time, you guys in the States will be safer for it.
Who really gives a **** if someone from Baghdad can`t visit Disney land this year ?
Who really gives a **** if someone from Baghdad can`t visit Disney land this year ?
Isis had been given a good kicking last year. Now their army will disperse around the world. Which is why those particular countries have been flagged.
Now the US security forces can put more resources into monitoring who is flying into the States from say, Belgium or Paris.
Now the US security forces can put more resources into monitoring who is flying into the States from say, Belgium or Paris.
Comment