If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Graysmith receives a well-deserved beating in the new Butterfield book. And I agree with Barn about Hewitt. The first two are excellent and the third jumps the shark.
Hi Tom, It has been a major frustration of mine that there is a dearth of good, accurate, non-sensational books on the Zodiac case.
The first two books by Mark Hewitt were good, but in his third book of the trilogy he, to my mind, spoils it by going for an unlikely suspect.
Anyway, on your recommendation, I have ordered the Butterfield book, it arrives tomorrow.
I don't believe I've read Hewitt. You'll enjoy Butterfield.
I acquired the kindle version of Butterfields book. $4.99.
So far so good.
The other Zodiac volume I was interested in is In the Shadow of Mt. Diablo.
Has anyone readMike Rodelli's book?
The Graysmith book lead to Fincher's exceptional movie, Glad for that.
I acquired the kindle version of Butterfields book. $4.99.
So far so good.
The other Zodiac volume I was interested in is In the Shadow of Mt. Diablo.
Has anyone readMike Rodelli's book?
The Graysmith book lead to Fincher's exceptional movie, Glad for that.
Yea, I've read the Rodelli book.
It's not a bad book, but the book is written from the author's point of view as he follows the twists and turns of the case, and gradually homes in on one particular suspect.
To my mind, Rodelli's suspect is probably the most outlandish suspect ever mooted in the case.
If you are looking for a good introduction to the case, I would rcommend the first two books by Mark Hewitt, but not the final book in the trilogy, where as JMenges astutely observes, the author "jumps the shark".
Comment