
Irritations
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post
Hi Mike.
I probably should have posted this 'irritant' elsewhere, but I didn't think it was worthy of its own thread.
I don't want to criticize the prosecution, because I fully understand and agree with their concern, but it could be that they overreached and charged Prussak with more serious crimes than could be definitively proven. But it is indeed jaw dropping that the jury thew out all of it and didn't find him guilty of at least the lesser charges.
I hope this is the last we hear of him, but I shudder to think that it won't be. Having read a lot of 'true crime,' leniency or avoidance of justice only tends to embolden a certain type of offender, if offender he intended to be.
I completely agree. Did this creep have OJ’s Legal Team behind him? Let’s hope that in a few years time when they’re finding bodies you don’t have reason to post a link to post number 176 of this thread.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
That’s a jaw-dropper Roger. Let’s hope that some disaster befalls this guy before he meets his next victim. The Judge and jury should be ashamed of themselves. There should be a re-trial and an inquiry.
I probably should have posted this 'irritant' elsewhere, but I didn't think it was worthy of its own thread.
I don't want to criticize the prosecution, because I fully understand and agree with their concern, but it could be that they overreached and charged Prussak with more serious crimes than could be definitively proven. But it is indeed jaw dropping that the jury thew out all of it and didn't find him guilty of at least the lesser charges.
I hope this is the last we hear of him, but I shudder to think that it won't be. Having read a lot of 'true crime,' leniency or avoidance of justice only tends to embolden a certain type of offender, if offender he intended to be.
Leave a comment:
-
Furthermore Abby, Champagne Supernova is just legit still to this day...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Posti know im gonna get lambasted for this but ive always liked oasis. theyre a big hot mess, alot of songs are nice little pop ditties with many verging on the rawer side, fighting brothers, huge band at one point.etc
plus i liked other bands from the genre including blur. it was all just a tad different, maybe the allure of something a little new.
their stuff is nothing groundbreaking but at least they are interesting.
however imho they and most other contemp bands way pale in comparison to the main new(ish) genre at the time... Grunge, which imho was the last great genre of rock.
Amen on that last sentence
Leave a comment:
-
'Halloween is for children.'
Women proceed to wear the sluttiest costumes going.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Enigma View PostWhy did the Personnel Department become Human Resources? In my working days I resented being classified as a resource rather than as a loyal member of staff.
There is just not a nice name for these generally vile people.
Even so, I think I'd go with 'Team for Before the Company Hires Lawyers They Hire Us.'
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rjpalmer View PostI'm 99% certain this is the same 'Robert Prussak' of California who had a restraining order against him by his ex-wife for domestic battery and sexual assault. Also, he allegedly had a 'nanny ap' installed on her phone to stalk her.
To state the blindingly obvious, no 57-year-old-man has any business taking a 9-year-old girl back to his flat. This was kidnapping.
Yes, I'm irritated.
Leave a comment:
-
i know im gonna get lambasted for this but ive always liked oasis. theyre a big hot mess, alot of songs are nice little pop ditties with many verging on the rawer side, fighting brothers, huge band at one point.etc
plus i liked other bands from the genre including blur. it was all just a tad different, maybe the allure of something a little new.
their stuff is nothing groundbreaking but at least they are interesting.
however imho they and most other contemp bands way pale in comparison to the main new(ish) genre at the time... Grunge, which imho was the last great genre of rock.Last edited by Abby Normal; 10-31-2024, 03:08 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rjpalmer View PostI'm 99% certain this is the same 'Robert Prussak' of California who had a restraining order against him by his ex-wife for domestic battery and sexual assault. Also, he allegedly had a 'nanny ap' installed on her phone to stalk her.
To state the blindingly obvious, no 57-year-old-man has any business taking a 9-year-old girl back to his flat. This was kidnapping.
Yes, I'm irritated.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm 99% certain this is the same 'Robert Prussak' of California who had a restraining order against him by his ex-wife for domestic battery and sexual assault. Also, he allegedly had a 'nanny ap' installed on her phone to stalk her.
To state the blindingly obvious, no 57-year-old-man has any business taking a 9-year-old girl back to his flat. This was kidnapping.
Yes, I'm irritated.
Leave a comment:
-
What the actual...
I read this on the BBC this morning:
"A former US Air Force pilot accused of kidnapping a nine-year-old girl outside Harrods and then sexually assaulting her has been found not guilty.
Robert Prussak approached the girl at the central London department store when she became separated from her family during a trip from France on 22 April.
He then walked her to his flat, and was accused of giving her bitter-tasting water allegedly containing the antihistamine Benadryl, which left her tired, the court had heard.
The 57-year-old, of no fixed address, was cleared of the offences at Isleworth Crown Court on Tuesday.
It was alleged that the pilot took the girl from the flat to Hyde Park and sexually assaulted her.
Mr Prussak was arrested later on the same day after he and the girl were spotted walking past the Israeli embassy by a Metropolitan Police officer who had been informed she was missing.
He was searched and said, "I was just trying to help her out", according to Sgt Edward Lucas.
Mr Prussak had denied all the charges against him.
Judge Edward Connell told Mr Prussak, who broke down in the dock as he was acquitted, that he was free to go.
Jurors had asked if there was any DNA evidence of the sexual assault just over an hour after they started deliberating on Monday, and the judge said there was not.
Mr Prussak was found not guilty of three counts of sexual assault of a child under the age of 13.
He was also cleared of one count of kidnapping, one count of committing an offence of kidnapping with an intent to commit a sexual offence, and one count of administering a substance with intent.
On Tuesday, the Metropolitan Police arrested a 57-year-old man at Isleworth Crown Court on suspicion of possessing indecent images of children.
He was taken to a police station and remains in custody."
Presumably, not the same 57-year-old man?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: