But if the "state" fails to protect the lives of its citizens by failing to provide adequate deterrents, then the "state" has murdered its citizens just the same, no?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
death penalty
Collapse
X
-
to all who are against the death penalty-
Id be more concerned about scores of convicted murderers who are released and kill again."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robert View PostBut if the "state" fails to protect the lives of its citizens by failing to provide adequate deterrents, then the "state" has murdered its citizens just the same, no?
not enough emphasis on the victims IMHO."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Robert
when the death penalty was operational, there were still murders, yes? So much for a deterrent.
Abby - convicted murderers should be imprisoned for life. This protects citizens but also allows the State to at least rectify those convictions which are unsafe by releasing the innocent. The State is unable to bring a dead man back to life.babybird
There is only one happiness in life—to love and be loved.
George Sand
Comment
-
innocent victims
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Postyup. and to my point above-especially when they release convicted murderers who go on murder more innocent victims.
not enough emphasis on the victims IMHO.babybird
There is only one happiness in life—to love and be loved.
George Sand
Comment
-
G'day Abby
to all who are against the death penalty-
Id be more concerned about scores of convicted murderers who are released and kill again.G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GUT View PostI don't know the stats where you are, but how many released killers ever kll again, most spend 30 or 40 years in gaol at least. What is wrong wth never to be released?Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment
-
G'day Pinkmoon
Downgrading murder to manslaughter is another issue, and as I posted earlier, QC's that I know tell me that after the death penalty was abolished here the conviction rate for murder went through the roof.G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by babybird67 View Postyes everybody has the right not to be murdered, and that includes murder by the state , therefore a system whereby even one innocent life is lost to murder by the state is unjustifiable.
Today I read on the news that another man wrongly convicted and on death row has been released.
Thank God he was not murdered before this point, although at any time he could have been.
It is bad enough that the state has stolen 30 odd years of his life, time which is irreplaceable, that he was prevented spending with his son, and now grandchildren.
If that state tells its citizens murder is wrong, the state must not engage in murder. Anything less is just unjust hypocrisy.
The state can murder you or I at will.
The US government turned up in Iraq and bombed the living daylights out of men, women and children. Killed many, displaced more, left children without Mothers and Fathers. Aided by the British Government and assorted Western sponsors.
So, let's dispel this notion that you or I have a right to a life that can't be taken away, and the notion of innocence or anything else. It's all blather.
No one has the right to a life, only the opportunity to build a harmonious community with like minded souls.
If someone was convicted of a crime, and subsequently found innocent, then the problem lies with the ability of jurors to get it right; not in the principle underpinning the punishment.
And, it's not the state. It's the people who make up a community. It's usually the state when our politicians make up a load of old bollocks about Iraqi WMDs that can hit you in the eye from a range of a billion hectres and at a speed of a billion hectres per milli-second. The people knew it was bollocks and there was an audible groan around the country: "not this shite again". Then it was the state. But, what we're talking of is the community and how it administers justice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by babybird67 View Post
when the death penalty was operational, there were still murders, yes? So much for a deterrent.
According to research there were somewhere between 10-20 murders in a year, in the whole of London, in Jack The Ripper's day.
These days we have 10-20 murders in a village in a few weeks, and at least10 x the number of serial killers on the loose at any one time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Postif a potential juror does not believe in the death penalty in a capital murder case they can be ruled out by the prosecutor during the juror screening process. usually a juror will admit they are against it.
Love,
Caz
X"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fleetwood Mac View PostDid you know that in every poll undertaken in England the majority are for the death penalty? Not by much, granted, say 55/45.
While some of the 45% would say so up front and not serve in a case where capital punishment was a real possibility, others would feel strongly enough to keep quiet but then refuse to convict.
Love,
Caz
X"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beowulf View PostKick em all out of jail and prison, could be errors.
We were talking about fatal errors. Rather hard for an innocent person to appeal from beyond the grave.
Love,
Caz
X"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
Comment
Comment