Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Survey/Intro

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    I don’t know if anyone will respond but I thought I’d give it a go. Twelve questions.
    1. Location (country will do but if you want, you could add your country of birth too if you want to)
    2. How did you first discover the case?
    3. What was the first book(s) that you read on the case?
    4. If you had to pick a number what would be your choice as the likeliest number of victims?
    5. Of the named suspects which, if any, do you think are the likeliest?
    6. This has been asked on another thread but….if you could be given the answer to one particular aspect of the case (not who did it) what would you choose?
    7. If you had the opportunity to question one of the witnesses in the case who would you choose?
    8. Is there any important aspect of the case that you’ve changed your mind about of the years?
    9. Do you have any pet hates about the case or how we look at it?
    10. How likely/unlikely do you think it is that the case will ever be solved?
    11. What books would you recommend to someone new to the case?
    12. Is there anyone in the case that you feel might be worth closer investigation as a possible suspect?
    maryland, usa
    I heard about the ripper since i was a kid.
    sugden
    seven...tabram through mckenzie
    hutch, bury, chapman, kelly, koz, (in order. ill stop at my top five)
    who were all the ripper victims, not just the fatal attacks
    hutch
    yes many, too many too account for here, but mainly about who were victims and who are valid suspects.
    yes, people with favored suspects who attack others valid suspects. Maybrick diary nonsense ad nauseum.
    unlikely, but still possible
    sugden
    yes many...barnett, flemming, richardson, barnardo, legrand, indian harry, mccarthy, crow, wildbore, francis thompson, donston, puckridge. im sure ive left out a few.
    not a named suspect, but Blotchy. he could very well have been the ripper.
    Last edited by Abby Normal; 08-09-2023, 12:49 PM.
    "Is all that we see or seem
    but a dream within a dream?"

    -Edgar Allan Poe


    "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
    quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

    -Frederick G. Abberline

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
      I don’t know if anyone will respond but I thought I’d give it a go. Twelve questions.[LIST=1][*]Location (country will do but if you want, you could add your country of birth too if you want to)
      An hour west of Toronto, Canada, but born & raised near Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.

      [*]How did you first discover the case?[*]What was the first book(s) that you read on the case?
      Same answer to both questions - I was likely about 15-16, I bought a paperback for my father who had been talking about someone called "Rip" like "Rip van Winkle" or "Jack the Ripper", and I thought this was what he was talking about. He never did read it, the book sat on the shelf for well over a year until one day I was at home sick and being bored I picked up the book to see what it was about.
      The book was Donald MacCormick's, The Mystery of Jack the Ripper.

      [*]If you had to pick a number what would be your choice as the likeliest number of victims?
      5

      [*]Of the named suspects which, if any, do you think are the likeliest?
      None

      [*]This has been asked on another thread but….if you could be given the answer to one particular aspect of the case (not who did it) what would you choose?
      To learn the true reason Druitt ended up in the river.

      [*]If you had the opportunity to question one of the witnesses in the case who would you choose?
      Sarah Lewis

      [*]Is there any important aspect of the case that you’ve changed your mind about of the years?
      Like a Yo-yo.......Whether Stride was a victim, or not.

      [*]Do you have any pet hates about the case or how we look at it?
      Probably too many to list, but it all boils down to the abundance of ridiculous suspects.

      [*]How likely/unlikely do you think it is that the case will ever be solved?
      Unlikely

      [*]What books would you recommend to someone new to the case?
      Without doubt - The Ultimate Jack the Ripper Sourcebook by Evans & Skinner, and The Jack the Ripper A-Z, by Paul Begg & others, and a subscription to the British Newspaper Archive, so you can do your own research.

      [*]Is there anyone in the case that you feel might be worth closer investigation as a possible suspect?
      One unnamed character known variously as, The Britannia-man, or the Bethnal-Green Botherer.

      Regards, Jon S.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
        An hour west of Toronto, Canada, but born & raised near Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.


        Same answer to both questions - I was likely about 15-16, I bought a paperback for my father who had been talking about someone called "Rip" like "Rip van Winkle" or "Jack the Ripper", and I thought this was what he was talking about. He never did read it, the book sat on the shelf for well over a year until one day I was at home sick and being bored I picked up the book to see what it was about.
        The book was Donald MacCormick's, The Mystery of Jack the Ripper.


        5


        None


        To learn the true reason Druitt ended up in the river.


        Sarah Lewis


        Like a Yo-yo.......Whether Stride was a victim, or not.


        Probably too many to list, but it all boils down to the abundance of ridiculous suspects.


        Unlikely


        Without doubt - The Ultimate Jack the Ripper Sourcebook by Evans & Skinner, and The Jack the Ripper A-Z, by Paul Begg & others, and a subscription to the British Newspaper Archive, so you can do your own research.


        One unnamed character known variously as, The Britannia-man, or the Bethnal-Green Botherer.
        yeah! the BGB botherer, other than the other unamed Blotchy, very intriguing. of course id say peaked cap man (the man seen by marshall, schwartz and lawende and company the night of the double event) but he was undoubtedly the ripper and could also have been the BGB and possibly blotchy any way.
        "Is all that we see or seem
        but a dream within a dream?"

        -Edgar Allan Poe


        "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
        quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

        -Frederick G. Abberline

        Comment


        • #34
          Cheers Abby and Wick.

          Wick I’ve been meaning to have another look at stuff concerning the BGB. Any chance of posting a link to some further info as I can’t rely on memory.
          Regards

          Sir Herlock Sholmes.

          “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
            Cheers Abby and Wick.

            Wick I’ve been meaning to have another look at stuff concerning the BGB. Any chance of posting a link to some further info as I can’t rely on memory.
            yes. i second that. ive always been highly intrigued by this guy.
            Last edited by Abby Normal; 08-09-2023, 04:15 PM.
            "Is all that we see or seem
            but a dream within a dream?"

            -Edgar Allan Poe


            "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
            quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

            -Frederick G. Abberline

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
              I don’t know if anyone will respond but I thought I’d give it a go. Twelve questions.
              1. Location (country will do but if you want, you could add your country of birth too if you want to)
              2. How did you first discover the case?
              3. What was the first book(s) that you read on the case?
              4. If you had to pick a number what would be your choice as the likeliest number of victims?
              5. Of the named suspects which, if any, do you think are the likeliest?
              6. This has been asked on another thread but….if you could be given the answer to one particular aspect of the case (not who did it) what would you choose?
              7. If you had the opportunity to question one of the witnesses in the case who would you choose?
              8. Is there any important aspect of the case that you’ve changed your mind about of the years?
              9. Do you have any pet hates about the case or how we look at it?
              10. How likely/unlikely do you think it is that the case will ever be solved?
              11. What books would you recommend to someone new to the case?
              12. Is there anyone in the case that you feel might be worth closer investigation as a possible suspect?
              1. South Wales, all my life.
              2. I seem to always have been vaguely aware of JtR - magazines, radio, tv, general chat.
              3. A magazine article encouraged me to search for more info, and as a result I foolishly bought a copy of Bruce Robinson's "They All Love Jack", because it was on sale at a giveaway price. It was so bad that I had to get a proper one - Paul Begg's "The Facts".
              4. Nichols, Chapman and Eddowes. Possibly plus Stride and/or Kelly. No others.
              5. None.
              6. I would ask Swanson to explain his marginalia to me.
              7. Maxwell - she says she actually spoke to Kelly, they were apparently on first name terms, she can be pretty sure of the time, and she made her statement on the same day. A second witness backs up the story of Kelly being about that morning. That ought to make Maxwell the best witness in the case by a country mile, and yet we are supposed to reject her as mistaken and believe others. How could she be so wrong? ...if she was ....
              8. The number of victims.
              9. Those with a theory and who then ignore or reject as wrong, any contrary evidence.
              10. Very unlikely.
              11. The A - Z and the Ultimate Source Book.
              12. No. I think JtR was probably an unknown back street butcher/slaughterer, but I am happy to listen to alternatives.

              Comment


              • #37
                Cheers Doc. You started with Robinson and yet you appear quite sane.
                Regards

                Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                  Cheers Doc. You started with Robinson and yet you appear quite sane.
                  Thank you!

                  Can I suggest an additional question, please? Is there any aspect of the case that you find particularly puzzling?

                  In my case it would be - why were the police holding up the opening of Kelly's room to await the bloodhounds? The room would be full of Kelly's scent, and that of blood etc, and would only have JtR's identifiable scent if he left a coat or some other item of clothing, and they could be sure it was his, which was never going to be likely.

                  Incidentally, I always think the bloodhounds should have been called Fido and Begg....

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                    I don’t know if anyone will respond but I thought I’d give it a go. Twelve questions.
                    1. Location (country will do but if you want, you could add your country of birth too if you want to)
                    2. How did you first discover the case?
                    3. What was the first book(s) that you read on the case?
                    4. If you had to pick a number what would be your choice as the likeliest number of victims?
                    5. Of the named suspects which, if any, do you think are the likeliest?
                    6. This has been asked on another thread but….if you could be given the answer to one particular aspect of the case (not who did it) what would you choose?
                    7. If you had the opportunity to question one of the witnesses in the case who would you choose?
                    8. Is there any important aspect of the case that you’ve changed your mind about of the years?
                    9. Do you have any pet hates about the case or how we look at it?
                    10. How likely/unlikely do you think it is that the case will ever be solved?
                    11. What books would you recommend to someone new to the case?
                    12. Is there anyone in the case that you feel might be worth closer investigation as a possible suspect?
                    1) Denver, but grew up in Minneapolis.
                    2) Star Trek Episode, Wolf in the Fold.
                    3) Philip Jose Farmer's Riverworld series,
                    4) Six - CR plus Tabram. Would accept 3 to 7. Nichols, Chapman, and Eddowes definite. Kelly, Tabram, Stride probable. Mackenzie possible.
                    5) UN Owen. David Cohen. James Hardiman.
                    6) What are the names of everyone killed by the Ripper murderer. This should answer who Mary Kelly really was, answer the TorsoRipper theory, and exonerate or condemn several of the suspects.
                    7) George Abberline. I'd pick his brain on all suspects that were investigated and why they were rejected. I'd also pick his brains about the witnesses = were they investigated, how accurate and truthful did he think they were, etc. If I can't count Abberline as a witness, then definitely Dr Phillips as the one who knew the most about the medical aspects of the case.
                    8) I went with the C5, but am less certain now.
                    9) People who don't let facts get in the way of a theory. Any author claiming to have definitely solved the case.
                    10) Wildly unlikely the case will ever be solved.
                    11) Any that provide general information about events and people, instead of selling a final solution.
                    12) George Capel Scudamore Lechmere.

                    My favored suspects I would rate as poor. I don't think there are any good suspects and most named suspects fall between lousy and ridiculous.
                    "The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren

                    "Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit View Post

                      Thank you!

                      Can I suggest an additional question, please? Is there any aspect of the case that you find particularly puzzling?

                      In my case it would be - why were the police holding up the opening of Kelly's room to await the bloodhounds? The room would be full of Kelly's scent, and that of blood etc, and would only have JtR's identifiable scent if he left a coat or some other item of clothing, and they could be sure it was his, which was never going to be likely.

                      Incidentally, I always think the bloodhounds should have been called Fido and Begg....
                      There are a few questions I could have added. I could have made it up to 20 but sadly it’s too late to add them now.

                      I’d have called the bloodhound’s Holmes and Watson (or maybe Sholmes and Whatsit)
                      Regards

                      Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                      “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Fiver View Post

                        1) Denver, but grew up in Minneapolis.
                        2) Star Trek Episode, Wolf in the Fold.
                        3) Philip Jose Farmer's Riverworld series,
                        4) Six - CR plus Tabram. Would accept 3 to 7. Nichols, Chapman, and Eddowes definite. Kelly, Tabram, Stride probable. Mackenzie possible.
                        5) UN Owen. David Cohen. James Hardiman.
                        6) What are the names of everyone killed by the Ripper murderer. This should answer who Mary Kelly really was, answer the TorsoRipper theory, and exonerate or condemn several of the suspects.
                        7) George Abberline. I'd pick his brain on all suspects that were investigated and why they were rejected. I'd also pick his brains about the witnesses = were they investigated, how accurate and truthful did he think they were, etc. If I can't count Abberline as a witness, then definitely Dr Phillips as the one who knew the most about the medical aspects of the case.
                        8) I went with the C5, but am less certain now.
                        9) People who don't let facts get in the way of a theory. Any author claiming to have definitely solved the case.
                        10) Wildly unlikely the case will ever be solved.
                        11) Any that provide general information about events and people, instead of selling a final solution.
                        12) George Capel Scudamore Lechmere.

                        My favored suspects I would rate as poor. I don't think there are any good suspects and most named suspects fall between lousy and ridiculous.
                        Cheers Fiver, for some inexplicable reason I thought you were English (based on zero evidence I have to add). Then again, when I first joined for six months or so I assumed that Sam Flynn was a woman (I don’t know why) until Abby said something like “Gareth’s a woman?”
                        Regards

                        Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                        “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

                          Cheers Fiver, for some inexplicable reason I thought you were English (based on zero evidence I have to add). Then again, when I first joined for six months or so I assumed that Sam Flynn was a woman (I don’t know why) until Abby said something like “Gareth’s a woman?”
                          lol. ironically im mistaken on here for female all the time.
                          "Is all that we see or seem
                          but a dream within a dream?"

                          -Edgar Allan Poe


                          "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                          quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                          -Frederick G. Abberline

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post

                            lol. ironically im mistaken on here for female all the time.
                            I don’t know why Abigail.
                            Regards

                            Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                            “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

                              I don’t know why Abigail.
                              lol. actually short for abnormal or Abner. hehehe
                              "Is all that we see or seem
                              but a dream within a dream?"

                              -Edgar Allan Poe


                              "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                              quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                              -Frederick G. Abberline

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit View Post

                                Thank you!

                                Can I suggest an additional question, please? Is there any aspect of the case that you find particularly puzzling?

                                In my case it would be - why were the police holding up the opening of Kelly's room to await the bloodhounds? The room would be full of Kelly's scent, and that of blood etc, and would only have JtR's identifiable scent if he left a coat or some other item of clothing, and they could be sure it was his, which was never going to be likely.

                                Incidentally, I always think the bloodhounds should have been called Fido and Begg....
                                Hi Doc,

                                I'll answer that one. I find it puzzling that in the 2 best known cases of policemen naming a suspect - Anderson/Swanson and Macnaughten - they get so many things wrong about their leading suspect.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X