Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
It seems possible you are deliberately inserting yourself into the discussion with the sole intention to try and discredit me.
In all honesty, the implication of what was said was that Dr Davies I think the writing analyser was too close to the principals involved. ie had a personal relationship. I except that isn't the exact phrase that was used. But it was clearly what was meant and that can be seen post after post. Anyone reading this thread can look back and see if they agree with my reading of this. Of course they will because that was what was said. I dont see a maybe there btw, it was given as a fact.
I asked immediately and continually what Ed meant and it wasn't until it got so far gone I paraphrased and used the words personal relationship he answered. Why? Because paraphrasing what was meant means I am somehow wrong and he has a great moral victory. No.
As for what I must do for a useful discussion, how dare you have the nerve to say such a thing, when you have come here with the express intention of having a go at me and adding nothing to the points (or lack thereof) raised? Setting this aside. Yes, I am trying to discuss with him the reasons he thinks there are possible holes, but its difficult when people like you come here trying to goad me and him.
If you would like to try speaking to me as though I am not a child, that would be a good place to start, that is if you don't expect a sarcastic answer. Not that you seem to recognise that was what I was clearly being in my remark about spongebob
Jenni
Comment