Originally posted by kensei
View Post
I doubt prisoners serving life or very long sentences, let alone on death row, are ever considered for anything other than directed donation (when a match within the family agrees to donate to that specific person). One requirement for a donor is "stewardship," or something-- I'm really not sure how it's phrased, but it's related to the person's ability to keep themselves in optimal health for their situation and degree of illness, take their anti-rejection drugs regularly, and so forth. Someone whose liver disease is the result of alcoholism is still a candidate to transplant if they are currently sober, but if they show up drunk to the transplant surgery, they don't get the organ. People with a co-morbidity that will shorten their lifespan significantly don't get on the transplant list-- you won't get a heart transplant if you also have brain cancer. HIV used to keep you off the transplant list, but now people with HIV can get organs from HIV+ but otherwise healthy donors.
I think there's a pretty good "stewardship" argument against putting death row inmates on the list.
Comment