If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Also, Mary Jane Kelly helped Hauptmann kidnap the Lindbergh baby.
OK, I went to far on that last one.
Not at all.
I'll take the Mary Kelly as JtR and say that fearing capture, she murdered a poor soul that she befriended in her own room, then escaped to America. Thus she could have been in on the Lindbergh kidnapping...
And the questions always linger, no real answer in sight
The worst Ripper suspect is obviously Florence Maybrick. She committed all the murders dressed in her husband's clothes. She then left her own initials on a partition wall and bribed a police photographer to make sure that they were visible in a photograph. After that she used her unparalleled knowledge of the crimes to fake an admission by her husband and etched the initials of her victims into 'his' gold watch.
Her piece de resistance was the decision to kill him before he had a chance to say, "Hang on a minute. That's not my handwriting and I've never owned a gold watch in my life". She therefore does time for one murder only and makes it look as though even that was a miscarriage of justice whereas he, one of her many victims, a man who wouldn't hurt a fly, goes down in history as the most notorious serial killer who ever lived.
I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.
If there is such a thing, it would be James Maybrick.
Because he is only a 'suspect' because of a single artefact (ok, two, but ...) whose provenance is dodgy. Worse, it is argubaly a demonstrable fake, based on textual analysis alone.
A counter argument could be made that the Dr Stanely hoax only had Matters, and the Rasputin-Okhrana hoax only had Le Queux.
Yet there is something uniquely vile about the Maybrick 'Diary' perhaps because those hustlers -- whomever they were -- used a real person, whereas the others were playing hamrless games with pure fiction.
I mean how despicable, really, to accuse a man who was long deceased and had nothing to do with the Whitechapel crimes, just seems beyond the pale ...
Anyone for Gilbert and Sullivan? I mean, what down on her luck prostitute would be suspicious of the comic opera Masters of England? Especially if they stalked her while singing "Three Little Maids".
The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
Anyone for Gilbert and Sullivan? I mean, what down on her luck prostitute would be suspicious of the comic opera Masters of England? Especially if they stalked her while singing "Three Little Maids".
Or the old, "Hey! We can make you a star!" line...
And the questions always linger, no real answer in sight
I mean how despicable, really, to accuse a man who was long deceased and had nothing to do with the Whitechapel crimes, just seems beyond the pale ...
Oh the irony.
Tell you what, Jonathan. You find the bugger wot dun the diary and I'll happily punch his/her lights out for you. I realise just how much this vile inanimate object is eating away at your very soul.
Love,
Caz
X
"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
Like most people here I find that hoax from the early 1990's to be old hat, and its advocates even more tiresome because they refuse to meet any criticism of the Maybrick con as a modern hoax which conned them -- and still does -- with anything but spluttering bile.
Comment