I was wondering if anyone here had any information about a piece of evidence suppressed by the Bay City Ohio Police investigation of the murder of Marilyn Sheppard. In a recent civil trial seeking to exonerate his Dad, Reese Sheppard requested all relevant documents concerning the original police investigation documents. Though the original conviction was overturned, this civil trial was decided for the state/police.
A short time ago a story appeared that the police, DA and Medical Examiner suppressed an initial report by the first police officers on the scene that the storm door in the basement had been broken into.
For those of us convinced that Dr. Sam Sheppard was framed for the murder of his wife, this would be the penultimate evidence of his innocence.
The total mishandling of Richard Eberling, who would, without prodding, tell police that his blood was at the crime scene because he had injured himself doing handyman work at the house earlier that week. The fact that he was to murder someone else, certainly makes him a more likely suspect than the unlikeable adulterer, Dr. Sam Sheppard.
It bothers me that officials suppress incredibly important evidence, which might have led to a different course and actually convicted the guilty party in 1954.
A short time ago a story appeared that the police, DA and Medical Examiner suppressed an initial report by the first police officers on the scene that the storm door in the basement had been broken into.
For those of us convinced that Dr. Sam Sheppard was framed for the murder of his wife, this would be the penultimate evidence of his innocence.
The total mishandling of Richard Eberling, who would, without prodding, tell police that his blood was at the crime scene because he had injured himself doing handyman work at the house earlier that week. The fact that he was to murder someone else, certainly makes him a more likely suspect than the unlikeable adulterer, Dr. Sam Sheppard.
It bothers me that officials suppress incredibly important evidence, which might have led to a different course and actually convicted the guilty party in 1954.
Comment