Tweet
I doubt I am the only one here who has taken an interest in this case. So soon after coming to world notice at the recent Olympic Games. I am all for NOT GUILTY until proven, however it seems to me that Pistorius is already guilty of premed murder, it's now just about who he intended to kill isn't it?
My case rests on his version of events. He collected his gun from beneath his bed, approached the toilet door. Shouted a challenge, got no answer so opened fire with 4 shots.
It does not matter how you argue this, the man was always going to shoot. Can he argue that he felt the "intruder" might have shot first?
How can he argue he felt his life was threatened by someone who had locked themselves in the loo? Also, he must have known that security were very close and alert, so help was at hand. Any thoughts? I'll buy you a pint.
My case rests on his version of events. He collected his gun from beneath his bed, approached the toilet door. Shouted a challenge, got no answer so opened fire with 4 shots.
It does not matter how you argue this, the man was always going to shoot. Can he argue that he felt the "intruder" might have shot first?
How can he argue he felt his life was threatened by someone who had locked themselves in the loo? Also, he must have known that security were very close and alert, so help was at hand. Any thoughts? I'll buy you a pint.