If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I only finished reading this book about a month ago!
I'm a Christian and so read it out of curiousity as to what someone who thinks the exact opposite to me really thinks. I enjoyed the historical chapters very much. I know he died recently of cancer when still in his fifties, which is very sad. I like his style of writing and his humour. I didn't find out anything new with regard to what atheists and agnostics think. I have also read the book by the other very famous author, Richard Dawkins, called 'The God Delusion'.
Instead of being convinced of their arguments I found myself even more convinced of my own beliefs, if that was possible.
Out of the two authors I consider Christopher Hitchens the more readable of the two.
Edmund Burke had a thing or two to say about those types - all predicted for good measure.
You have to laugh at the sheer contempt these people hold for the average person. Who would have thought that the average man on the street could arrive at the conclusion that there probably isn't a god -seeing is believing - not those two.
I have read both "god Is Not Great" and "The God Delusion." I thought they were both excellent particularly Hitchens. I don't find them hypocritical at all. Do they both have a big ego? You betcha. I was particulary impressed with how Hitchens dealt with his esopegeal cancer. He accepted it as the inevitable result of a lifetime of smoking and drinking to excess. When religious people offered their sympathy and well wishes he simply thanked them.
Just noticed the spelling on the book cover at the top. Here in the U.S. it is published with a lower case g in God. It is also subtitled "How Religion Poisons Everything." Even if you remained unconvinced that there is no God after reading the book, his attacks on ALL religion are incredibly scathing, extremely well argued and (for me) almost impossible to refute. The weakest argument made by him as well as Dawkins has to do with the fact that virtually every society in history has had some kind of religious belief. It seems to be hard wired into human beings. He and Dawkins argue that it is the result of being indoctrinated by our parents at a young age and that our parents simply parrot what they were told by their parents and so on. Maybe, but I thought that was the weakest argument in the book.
I've read "The God Delusion" which I thought was excellent but not this one. I'd been meaning to bag a copy for a while but have just found you can get it free on PDF format. Looking forward to giving it a go, particularly as, judging from interviews I've seen, Hitchens has a nice line in dry humour.
Best wishes,
Steve.
PS I note the cover as shown by Jukka does not feature the subtitle "How Religion Poisons Everything". Any thoughts on why this is the case?
Like I said, it is useful to read from both ends of the matter.
I didn't say, that Hitchens is some superhuman cosmic being (Dawkings is only a name on the cover for me, by the way). On the contrary, he is as easy to fall into a human error just like you, me and everyone. (I came to this conclusion by reading the book! )
Being an agnostic, I don't find the Bible, the Koran, the Bhagavadgita (sorry for a possible misspelling! ) etc. any cosmic or spiritual either. However, I do respect everyone's right to think otherwise, as long as it won't lead to violence.
Something for DVV; I have met more extreme christians demanding me to believe on an either-or basis than atheists or agnostics.
All the best
Jukka
"When I know all about everything, I am old. And it's a very, very long way to go!"
Comment