Let me never hear the phrase "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter' ever again.
I can well understand the sentiment that makes you write that. But the fact is that, in certain circumstances, it can be true.
Take the French resistance 1940-45, as but one example.
If one's country was occupied, would one not wish to fight back?
But terrorism should NEVER be a weapon inside a democractic country against the rightful Government. There are other ways of expressing dissent and seeking change - demonstration, persuasion, using the political process. Almost always it becomes a weapon in the hands of minorities who's extreme views will never win over anyone except the already marginalised, the criminal or the mentally unstable.
My hope is that this will show up the idiots in the EDL and the BNP for what they are.
Phil
I can well understand the sentiment that makes you write that. But the fact is that, in certain circumstances, it can be true.
Take the French resistance 1940-45, as but one example.
If one's country was occupied, would one not wish to fight back?
But terrorism should NEVER be a weapon inside a democractic country against the rightful Government. There are other ways of expressing dissent and seeking change - demonstration, persuasion, using the political process. Almost always it becomes a weapon in the hands of minorities who's extreme views will never win over anyone except the already marginalised, the criminal or the mentally unstable.
My hope is that this will show up the idiots in the EDL and the BNP for what they are.
Phil
Comment