If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Chainz/Jordan, Limehouse mentioned Hitler as a reference to evil, not in any comparison to Palin. I agree that Michael's calling Palin “evil“ was inflammatory, but it'd be quite impossible to deny Palin's idiocy. Voters lobbying for Palin are not necessarily all idiots ;-) too, as many folks clearly do so for sentimental reasons, such as Hunter and Stan Reid. I'm also pretty sure that noone called Palin supporters “evil“. So there's no real need to get upset. (At least until Palin's really close to getting nominated as a presidential candidate, but this will never happen, so no worries.)
Why do you feel the need to call someone so many names? I knew some people in high school who did this non stop and they were without a doubt the worst people I have ever met. When you keep posting this I keeping thinking back to them and I don't want to because I really, really hope you're not like that. But I guess I've made my point so I'm not going to be a part of this discussion anymore
Later
Jordan
Chainz/Jordan, Limehouse mentioned Hitler as a reference to evil, not in any comparison to Palin. I agree that Michael's calling Palin “evil“ was inflammatory, but it'd be quite impossible to deny Palin's idiocy. Voters lobbying for Palin are not necessarily all idiots ;-) too, as many folks clearly do so for sentimental reasons, such as Hunter and Stan Reid. I'm also pretty sure that noone called Palin supporters “evil“. So there's no real need to get upset. (At least until Palin's really close to getting nominated as a presidential candidate, but this will never happen, so no worries.)
Limehouse most clearly didn't compare Palin to Hitler, Chainz.
Why is this so hard to understand? All I posted was that you can have a discussion with someone without calling them evil and an idiot. Why Adolf Hitler is even brought up in a thread about Sarah Palin blows my mind.
But I really don't want to get into this anymore so I guess we can just disagree
Later
Jordan
Just as Hitler used a macro theory of all Jews having certain properties, Palin invoke "Joe Six pack" to express the alcoholic, blue collar nature of the GOP voter base. Neither are accurate, both were used extensively and nationally as part of political rhetoric.
What's new? Politicians have been using such generalisations, trying to reach out and “identify“ with group voters since the dawn of human civilization.
Hitler (besides having been essentially stupid and mentally ill, though obviously not of such minor capacities as Palin) was actually quite the successful campaigner (though he didn't organize the campaigns himself), taking great advantage of the fact that Germany was in complete shambles during the Weimar Republic, after having been taken advantage of (by their own mistakes) and left severely diminished in the power exchange after World War I.
Still, I don't see any reason whatsoever to compare an evil world leader with an insignificant resigned governor/wannabe candidate from Alaska.
The analogy is not entirely unfounded. Just as Hitler used a macro theory of all Jews having certain properties, Palin invoked "Joe Six pack" to express the alcoholic, blue collar nature of the GOP voter base. Neither are accurate, both were used extensively and nationally as part of political rhetoric. Oh and of course, they are both dumber than a box of rocks. Dave
Hello Dave, I've previously commented on the “incorrect“, unfortunate title used by Michael for his thread, because Palin is technically not “evil“, in any sense of the term whatsoever, even if her nomination to presidential candidate would bring out evil consequences (and endless embarrassment for the US internationally).
Quote Protohistorian:
Yes Maria, but she will not be nominated by the choice of others.
She'd most certainly be nominated by the choice of OTHERS (despite of her very own delusions of grandeur). The Republican party's not that dumb. Strategically it's a whole another matter to nominate Palin as a vice-presidential candidate to “rejuvenate“ and to “politically correct“ their campaign featuring Methusalah McCain as President (especially on a year when the opposite party went for a woman and a black guy as presidential candidates), still, the Republicans are not as dumb as to go for an already failed election candidate twice, especially for a candidate featuring such low caliber and severely lacking experience and basic intelligence, as Palin does.
Yes Maria, but she will not be nominated by the choice of others. Her dip **** ass believes she should, nay rightfully, should be nominated.She is an idiot, and since idiocy of moral standard could make one evil, I believe we have to leave the door open on that one as well. It is not a matter of being mean. She does this to herself. Dave
"Teabaggers“ has to be the most unfortunate nickname for a so-called “protest movement“ in the history of politics, and Palin most certainly will not be nominated a presidential candidate, after having already lost once to Obama in 2008, and after having stupidly resigned her governor post mid term.
Palin is supported by the Teabaggers and the NRA and the closed-minded Christian Right (as opposed to open-minded Christians (oxy-moron?)).
If this nutjob can become president, it shows us how easily led the American populace is. A few words from Limbaugh (dirtbag), Hannity (disingenuous lump of dung), and Beck (Satan's disciple who may be dumber than Palin), and anything can happen.
This is why I don't like politics. You can disagree with someone without calling them harsh names like evil and idiot.Would you like someone calling you that?Once you've personally insulted someone in a debate I think the other person has won the discussion
Jordan
Well Hitler was evil - that's for sure. I suppose the best plan is not to give anyone a reason to call you evil or idiotic.
This is why I don't like politics. You can disagree with someone without calling them harsh names like evil and idiot.Would you like someone calling you that?Once you've personally insulted someone in a debate I think the other person has won the discussion
Jordan
LOL..so what you didn't read it the first time you responded to that post? You waited a few more posts before reading it and then deciding to drop out? I am not the one unhinged. That'd be you.
You do realize you have the option of deleting within the quote tags so you don't have to quote an entire forty paragraph post to respond to one line? Always glad to educate the unlearned.
Leave a comment: