On The Trail Of The Forgers

[plang]

Just a wild guess, Graham and caps., for starters.

[cappuccina]

Hi Graham...Here are the...

...Diary Supporters...

http://www.herniarelievers.com/?gclid=CLKh1Pf_4JMCFQZinAod_3lhWA

Here is the Head Diary Supporter:

http://www.herniarelievers.com/product.php?productid=16156&cat=254&page=1

Warning, not for the faint of heart or small children!

[Graham]

Oh yes, it is easy to see the diary supporters. Yet as I said before, none of you have the guts to come out and say it in a straight forward fashion.
Cowards!!!
Plang

So who exactly are the 'Diary Supporters', Plang?

Cheers,

Graham

[plang]

Oh yes, it is easy to see the diary supporters. Yet as I said before, none of you have the guts to come out and say it in a straight forward fashion.
Cowards!!!
Plang

[Steve Powell]

Skinneritis

Graham said:

"If you've got never-before published information regarding the Diary and don't share it with us, then quite rightly you'll be accused of adopting the Skinner Tactic that you and others so strongly condemn.
Spill the beans, mate!!"

I came here to the casebook to tell you
all about what I know concerning the diary
and have been doing so all along.
I wanted us all to stand on equal footage
and discuss the facets together and come
to a conclusion of what should be done about the hoax.
Well, believe it or not, all of you have helped me.
It began to dawn on me that I needed to put
it all down in a book, as there was too
much to tell and I wanted you to know it all.
For those of you that have followed the trail with me,
I shall continue to tell you all I know.
But, I am now under contract to a publisher and cannot
at the moment tell you the rest of the story until the book comes out.
The day it is released, I shall post the other information.
I'm sure you can understand that.
In the meantime, why don't you question how
Feldman put it all together?

regards,
Steve Powell
fri6june2008

[Maria]

John:

Skinniarized... I LIKE that !

That is a clever new term. It made me laugh It could also mean... being skinny with the truth.

I wonder if Keith Skinner knows that his name will be synonimous with being very skinny with the truth !

-Maria

[Omlor]

Hi Maria,

In a technical sense, you are right I suppose. If Steve does indeed have material that he has not shared here yet, as he suggests, at least he has not announced to everyone what, specifically, that secret material or knowledge allows him to conclude without then putting it forward to support such a claim or even offering an explanation for why he won't make it public. So he hasn't really Skinnerized it just yet.

We'll have to see how he responds to Graham's questions, I suppose.

All the best,

--John

[Victoria]

"Skinner Tactic"

If the 'secret evidence' he refers to as
"what I know and hasn't been said here"
.. .. is going to be very soon revealed in his book,
I would not class that as a "Skinner Tactic", as we
will not be waiting a year ... or never.

And if I was recommending a book or film to you, I would
not want to spoil it here, by giving you all the juicy details ..
just a bit of the trail ..
or like the 'trailer' for the film.
So my advice for Steve is, say nothing, keep it for the book,
I want to read something that has not been told here.

[Graham]

John:

What Graham meant, he has to explain to us himself.

Stephen is not Caroline who has secret squirrels investigations, since he has never boasted he has, unlike her side kick Keith Skinner.

I think that Stephen meant to say what Keith Skinner has not revealed to us about the Battlecrease evidence.

-Maria

John has described in his post precisely what I meant.

Graham

[Maria]

John:

What Graham meant, he has to explain to us himself.

Stephen is not Caroline who has secret squirrels investigations, since he has never boasted he has, unlike her side kick Keith Skinner.

I think that Stephen meant... what Keith Skinner has not revealed to us about the Battlecrease evidence.

John, read the top part and bottom part of Stephenīs post. It is all about the Feldmanīs Battlecrease " evidence"

-Maria

[Omlor]

I think Graham was referring to what, in Steve's last post, he refers to as "what I know that hasn't been said here". He says this is information "regarding the matter of the diary."

Well, I hope Steve isn't just mentioning some secret evidence he has that he won't show us. And I hope he won't refuse even to explain why he won't show it to us, despite announcing to everyone what it allows him allegedly to conclude.

Because if that's what he's doing, then Graham is right. It's the "Skinner Tactic" all over again.

Glad the thing now has a proper name,

--John

[Maria]

Graham:

Steve Powell has already spilled the beans by telling us about Feldman being behind the hoax in collaboration with Stephen Park and Ann Graham who was in Australia by her own admission at the time. Australia, where all this hoax was hatched. What else do you want ? It all adds up to me.

-Maria

[Graham]

Steve,

If you've got never-before published information regarding the Diary and don't share it with us, then quite rightly you'll be accused of adopting the Skinner Tactic that you and others so strongly condemn.

Spill the beans, mate!!

Cheers,

Graham

[Steve Powell]

'Last Card' Battlecrease.

There was a time here when most of the troopers
thought that I was being stupid and theatrical
about naming Feldman as the man behind the hoax diary.
That perception I feel has changed somewhat now
as you begin to see that there is something
in what I have been constantly saying.
The wonder of the whole diary fiasco
is that Feldman managed to pull most of it off.
The man was a near genius and deserves credit
for his outrageous and near perfect plan.
It is so like something out of a hollywood movie
that it is very difficult to believe it true, by anyone.
He created all of the scenario provenances we know.
Even the one that Keith Skinner is juggling with now:
The finding of the diary at Battlecrease.
Steven Park told me that this scenario was thought of
by Feldman way back in the late 1970's.
The real question for me, and should be for you,
is why Mr. Skinner is thinking of using this 'last card' tale?
Skinner is not stupid, we all know that.
Yet he seems determined to hold faith with Feldman.
When I asked Caroline by PM to ask Skinner if he would
contact me about some interesting information
that I had regarding the matter of the diary,
she came back to me and said that he didn't mind if I
told all of the 'troopers' whatever I knew.
In other words 'bugger off'.
Don't you think Keith Skinner would like to hear
a little bit more of what I know that hasn't been said here?
You bet he does, but he can't take that path,
as the tactic of the protectors of the diary
is to try and discredit me whenever they can.
After all, my story is so fantastic it just couldn't be true.
Could it?
What has Skinner got to lose if the truth about Feldman
and the hoaxing of the diary ever comes out from the mud?
Maybe a lot.

regards troopers,
Steve Powell
thu5june2008

[Victoria]

Victoria:

You will see how she avoids answering it as the days, the months and the years slip by and surprise, surprise, no answer... that is Caroline for you.

You will get to know and get used to this evasiveness. It is all old and in the end it gets very boring.

-Maria

Hello Caz,

Maybe you missed my post from yesterday .. that only required some
small answer or explanation .. I felt ignored, or at least left out.

I thought possibly that you had given an explanation maybe before,
say on the crashed thread and I may have missed it, and you were sick of repeating yourself.
But probably not, as I see from John's persistant questioning and Maria's
above words.

There should be no problem answering, the best way you can, it should show that you have nothing to hide ..
and it is a chance to prove Maria's words
wrong .. that should be tempting.

~Victoria