Semantics and semen antics - but Limehouse, leaving aside whether the gunman was a trigger happy twit or just a twit with a gun, how do you think anyone, in 1961 or today, could have removed every last trace of the killer from that car, inside and out, but left innocent sets of fingerprints on/in it? Or have I got that wrong? Did they in fact find nobody's prints either? And wouldn't that have been mighty suspicious?
Love,
Caz
X
Love,
Caz
X
Comment