a6 murder

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jimarilyn
    *
    • Mar 2008
    • 944

    #3691
    Originally posted by Limehouse View Post
    Also:

    "And the darkest hour is just before dawn"
    Dedicated to the One I Love
    Mamas & Papas
    Hi Julie,

    Also....."The darkest hour is just before dawn" a beautiful song by the great Emmylou Harris, from her 1980 album "Roses in the snow"


    regards,
    James

    Comment

    • Limehouse
      Chief Inspector
      • Mar 2008
      • 1895

      #3692
      Hi James,

      "The Darkest Hour is Just before Dawn"

      Reckon that line must be biblical then - or Dylan penned it and they all liked it so much they couldn't resist using it!

      I like Dylan very much too. Recently, my husband and I were trying to draw up a list of our favourite Dylan tracks but it's just so hard not to keep adding another one.

      Julie

      Comment

      • jimornot?
        Detective
        • Dec 2008
        • 213

        #3693
        Originally posted by Limehouse View Post
        Hi James,

        "The Darkest Hour is Just before Dawn"

        Reckon that line must be biblical then - or Dylan penned it and they all liked it so much they couldn't resist using it!

        I like Dylan very much too. Recently, my husband and I were trying to draw up a list of our favourite Dylan tracks but it's just so hard not to keep adding another one.

        Julie
        Hi Julie, Reg and James

        apparently phrase first used in 1650 by a theologian Thomas Fuller http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/darkest-hour.html

        Didn't really rate / know much of Dylan until I got his Greatest Hits album - not really one bad track on it and several fantastic lyrics - even if some inspiration came from long-gone theolgians

        all the best

        Viv

        Comment

        • jimornot?
          Detective
          • Dec 2008
          • 213

          #3694
          passing cars

          Originally posted by larue View Post
          hi Limehouse

          this is a verrrrry interesting point. but then again, if is was light enough for ms storie to see her assailant, why should she mention a passing car?
          Hi Larue and all

          (very good to see you back here btw Larue)

          Indeed. At the end of the day Valerie is adamant she got a good enough view of the assailant and when one considers the time spent in the car with him, there is surely every reason for her to feel confident in this. Perhaps the car came by that much earlier and she was mistaken about timings.

          Interested about the message in the stones - think I missed reference to this. If verifiable it would tend to add weight to her assertion about the eye colour wouldn't it and perhaps mean we should accept that previous reporting of brown eyes was an error

          ATB

          Viv

          Comment

          • Victor
            Chief Inspector
            • Feb 2008
            • 1501

            #3695
            Originally posted by jimornot? View Post
            Interested about the message in the stones - think I missed reference to this. If verifiable it would tend to add weight to her assertion about the eye colour wouldn't it and perhaps mean we should accept that previous reporting of brown eyes was an error
            That's the problem, it's not verifiable. No-one found the stones, Kerr didn't spot them, but by that time he had noted down some details, albeit that that went missing later. No police officer saw them, but they were getting their information first hand from the victim. In fact the only reference to it is VS sworn testimony - but she has no reason to lie, and all her other details are correct.

            The brown eyes was a police error, but it was said on camera and the media ran with it, there is no evidence that VS ever said it.

            KR,
            Vic.
            Truth is female, since truth is beauty rather than handsomeness; this [...] would certainly explain the saying that a lie could run around the world before Truth has got its, correction, her boots on, since she would have to chose which pair - the idea that any woman in a position to choose would have just one pair of boots being beyond rational belief.
            Unseen Academicals - Terry Pratchett.

            Comment

            • jimarilyn
              *
              • Mar 2008
              • 944

              #3696
              Originally posted by Victor View Post
              That's the problem, it's not verifiable. No-one found the stones, Kerr didn't spot them, but by that time he had noted down some details, albeit that that went missing later. No police officer saw them, but they were getting their information first hand from the victim. In fact the only reference to it is VS sworn testimony - but she has no reason to lie, and all her other details are correct.

              The brown eyes was a police error, but it was said on camera and the media ran with it, there is no evidence that VS ever said it.

              KR,
              Vic.
              Seeing as you are so keen on people providing evidence Victor, where indeed is your evidence/proof that the brown eyes statement is a police error ?

              As you say, the police were getting their information from Miss Storie, so WHO do you think was the source of Superintendent Morgan's televised police statement on the morning of the murder ? ...."We are anxious to trace a man of the following description ....aged about 30 years, 5 feet 6, proportionate build, dark brown hair, palish face, erm...brown eyes, very-deep set, not very-deep set, straight nose, wearing a dark lounge suit and believed to have an East End London accent."

              Do you think the Superintendent was making it up as he was going along ?
              Just three days later (sorry for repeating myself here) when she was helping Det-Sgt Mackle compose the identikit photo, Valerie Storie confirmed that the killer's eyes were dark (not light) in colour.

              Your presume a lot in the last two lines of your post.

              KP
              James

              Comment

              • Victor
                Chief Inspector
                • Feb 2008
                • 1501

                #3697
                Originally posted by jimarilyn View Post
                WHO do you think was the source of Superintendent Morgan's televised police statement on the morning of the murder ? ...."We are anxious to trace a man of the following description ....aged about 30 years, 5 feet 6, proportionate build, dark brown hair, palish face, erm...brown eyes, very-deep set, not very-deep set, straight nose, wearing a dark lounge suit and believed to have an East End London accent."
                Hi James,
                This was discussed a while ago and Graham stated that in the interview Morgan wasn't clear when he made the statement and is almost certainly the source of the brown eyes comment.

                Do you think the Superintendent was making it up as he was going along ?
                No I think he was ill-prepared and mis-read the notes and got confused.

                Just three days later (sorry for repeating myself here) when she was helping Det-Sgt Mackle compose the identikit photo, Valerie Storie confirmed that the killer's eyes were dark (not light) in colour.
                The light or dark discussion is also quite recent. Both Woffinden and Foot have a picture on their cover with Hanratty with dark eyes which only leads me to the conclusion that sometimes Hanratty's eyes appearred to be dark.

                KR,
                Vic.
                Truth is female, since truth is beauty rather than handsomeness; this [...] would certainly explain the saying that a lie could run around the world before Truth has got its, correction, her boots on, since she would have to chose which pair - the idea that any woman in a position to choose would have just one pair of boots being beyond rational belief.
                Unseen Academicals - Terry Pratchett.

                Comment

                • larue
                  Detective
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 308

                  #3698
                  Originally posted by Limehouse View Post
                  I like Dylan very much too. Recently, my husband and I were trying to draw up a list of our favourite Dylan tracks but it's just so hard not to keep adding another one.
                  Julie
                  reckon 'desolation row' must be in there somewhere, and 'sad eyed lady of the lowlands' and maybe two or three hundred others

                  no easy task
                  atb

                  larue

                  Comment

                  • larue
                    Detective
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 308

                    #3699
                    Originally posted by Victor View Post
                    Hi James,
                    This was discussed a while ago and Graham stated that in the interview Morgan wasn't clear when he made the statement and is almost certainly the source of the brown eyes comment.
                    KR,
                    Vic.
                    hi all


                    Superintendent Morgan's televised police statement on the morning of the murder is included in Bob Woffinden's documentary, and for what it's worth, i thought Superintendent Morgan sounded clear and confident when he read out the description, stumbling only on the 'deep set' eyes part.

                    as an aside, i have another source of information which states that VS described brown eyes on day one, and maintained this for the first month after the attack, changing it only after she was transferred to Guys hospital, about the same time as she made the 'my memory of this man is fading' confession to Mr Acott.

                    i have attempted to contact the source of this statement, to aks if he is prepared to discuss his sources, but, as with Mr Sherrard, i have met with no success, as yet.
                    atb

                    larue

                    Comment

                    • jimarilyn
                      *
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 944

                      #3700
                      I totally disagree about your assessment of Superintendent Morgan, Victor. The man obviously was very experienced in his job and would know the importance of issuing an accurate and truthful statement in the hunt for a murderer. He was quite clear in his statement and even corrected his initial mis-reading of "very deep-set".
                      You think he was ill prepared and mis-read his notes. Ill prepared, a policeman about to issue an important statement on a live ITV News report ?? Do you think he was also confused about the gunman's age, height, build, complexion, nose etc., or was it just the eye colour that he got wrong ?
                      It stands to reason that there could only have been one source for the gunman's description, namely the victim herself, speaking to police officers at Bedford Hospital earlier that morning.

                      Superintendent Morgan's interview can be seen and heard 4 minutes and 7 seconds into the YouTube video below.




                      KP,
                      James

                      Comment

                      • jimarilyn
                        *
                        • Mar 2008
                        • 944

                        #3701
                        Originally posted by larue View Post
                        hi all


                        Superintendent Morgan's televised police statement on the morning of the murder is included in Bob Woffinden's documentary, and for what it's worth, i thought Superintendent Morgan sounded clear and confident when he read out the description, stumbling only on the 'deep set' eyes part.

                        as an aside, i have another source of information which states that VS described brown eyes on day one, and maintained this for the first month after the attack, changing it only after she was transferred to Guys hospital, about the same time as she made the 'my memory of this man is fading' confession to Mr Acott.

                        i have attempted to contact the source of this statement, to aks if he is prepared to discuss his sources, but, as with Mr Sherrard, i have met with no success, as yet.
                        Hi Larue,

                        Looks like our posts have crossed.

                        Re. Dylan I wouldn't know where to start to compile even a top 100 from his prodigious output of classics.


                        regards,
                        James

                        Comment

                        • larue
                          Detective
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 308

                          #3702
                          Originally posted by jimornot? View Post
                          Hi Larue and all
                          (very good to see you back here btw Larue)
                          thank you for saying so Viv

                          Originally posted by jimornot? View Post
                          Indeed. At the end of the day Valerie is adamant she got a good enough view of the assailant and when one considers the time spent in the car with him, there is surely every reason for her to feel confident in this. Perhaps the car came by that much earlier and she was mistaken about timings.
                          that maybe so, but i don't know it jibes with her later remark about her fading memory of the man's face, and her failure at the Alpon id parade.
                          atb

                          larue

                          Comment

                          • Limehouse
                            Chief Inspector
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 1895

                            #3703
                            Originally posted by jimornot? View Post
                            Hi Larue and all

                            (very good to see you back here btw Larue)

                            Indeed. At the end of the day Valerie is adamant she got a good enough view of the assailant and when one considers the time spent in the car with him, there is surely every reason for her to feel confident in this. Perhaps the car came by that much earlier and she was mistaken about timings.

                            Interested about the message in the stones - think I missed reference to this. If verifiable it would tend to add weight to her assertion about the eye colour wouldn't it and perhaps mean we should accept that previous reporting of brown eyes was an error

                            ATB

                            Viv
                            Writing a message with stones seems to lend weight to my suggestion that it was not so very dark when the killer left the scene of the murder. It would be difficult to locate stones (when you can't move very much) and compose them into a message without a reasonable amount of light.

                            Julie

                            Comment

                            • jimarilyn
                              *
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 944

                              #3704
                              Originally posted by larue View Post
                              [blast!!!! that's another post disappeared into the ether. does anyone else have this trouble???]
                              I used to have this problem Larue, gremlins getting in the works and preventing a post from appearing on the thread. So annoying to see posts disappearing somewhere into the great unknown of cyber space.

                              Most of the time (another Dylan song !) nowadays I compose a post using Wordpad and copy and paste it. Much more reliable.

                              regards,
                              James

                              Comment

                              • Rob63
                                Constable
                                • Dec 2008
                                • 61

                                #3705
                                I`m just reading a book called 'War Crimes: Underworld Britain in WW2 by M.J. Trow ISBN 978 1 84415 728 0. Whilst obviously not dealing with this specific case it has some very interesting cases and observations regarding crime during WW2 and the immediate post war years. I `ve found it intriguing and hardly been able to put it down so far...well worth a read as the late `50s early `60s seem to have more in common with the war years than in comparison with contemporary times.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X