What evidence is there that Storie actually did try to spell out "Blue Eyes" with the aid of stones in the layby at Deadman's Hill?
This is stated in the "Facts" section by the CACD at paragraph 25 and I quote:
She may have told the jury this; but is it an actual fact?
Was any evidence ever found to corroborate this rock art revelation at Deadman's Hill? I haven't heard of any. If not why not? She would no doubt, if she really did try to spell out this vital description, have mentioned it fairly soon after having been found.
I contend that Storie lied and no such thing ever happened. In fact it should be fairly obvious to any intelligent thinking person (right, left, upside down or whatever) that Storie didn't have the first idea regarding the identity of Gregstens murderer. The whole covert side of Stories statements was not fully discovered until the early 1990's.
Acott stage managed the whole A6 murder case fiasco from the very shaky start to the piss poor finish.
The FSS's Dr Whitaker put the cherry on the top of this rancid cake when he fiddled the interpretation of the DNA evidence in 2002 to help nail the case against Hanratty.
Just out of interest, a little bird told me that Woffinden is raising funds to have the DNA evidence in this case reexamined by DNA experts in the USA.
This is stated in the "Facts" section by the CACD at paragraph 25 and I quote:
With her right hand she gathered up some stones and told the jury that she tried to make the words "blue eyes" and "brown hair".
Was any evidence ever found to corroborate this rock art revelation at Deadman's Hill? I haven't heard of any. If not why not? She would no doubt, if she really did try to spell out this vital description, have mentioned it fairly soon after having been found.
I contend that Storie lied and no such thing ever happened. In fact it should be fairly obvious to any intelligent thinking person (right, left, upside down or whatever) that Storie didn't have the first idea regarding the identity of Gregstens murderer. The whole covert side of Stories statements was not fully discovered until the early 1990's.
Acott stage managed the whole A6 murder case fiasco from the very shaky start to the piss poor finish.
The FSS's Dr Whitaker put the cherry on the top of this rancid cake when he fiddled the interpretation of the DNA evidence in 2002 to help nail the case against Hanratty.
Just out of interest, a little bird told me that Woffinden is raising funds to have the DNA evidence in this case reexamined by DNA experts in the USA.
Comment