Originally posted by Limehouse
View Post
Yeah, it's Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics.
The point I am trying to make is that DNA seems to behave in ways we do not always expect.
The DNA taken from VS's panties was very old and a minute sample at that. There is also still a strong possibility of cross contamination from other exhibits - so - how do we know that any other DNA that possibly existed on those panties didn't disappear, evaporate or something...
...and how do we know that a similar result to the case of the two women didn't occur - after all, if such cases are so rare - we are talking about two cases well over forty years apart.
Am I making sense??
...which basically says that it's possible to artificially make a sample of someone's DNA which could then be planted at a crime scene. Conspiracy theorists can fill their boots.
KR,
Vic.
Comment