JonBenet Ramsey Murder case

[Wickerman]

Hi wicks
Who was wolf and why did Ramsey suspect him?

The top half of this page covers all the details,

http://jonbenetramsey.pbworks.com/w/page/11682476/Foreign%20Political%20Faction

Wolf was a reporter who couldn't account for his movements on the night in question, his girlfriend was suspicious about him and he had a T-shirt with SBTC on it.
He refused to cooperate with police too, etc.

[Wickerman]

You should stop reading (and quoting) fiction.

Surely you know that a book written by someone about themselves is always is going to be self-serving?

The post was about the opinion of Judge Carnes, not the claims by John Ramsey.

John Ramsey named everybody he could think of as being the murderer of JonBenet. They were all cleared, except for himself and Patsy.

Steve Thomas was the lead detective on the case. Because the Ramseys did not like what he had to say about them (which I happen to think was the truth) they sued him for £10M.

It seems that if you are very wealthy you can not only get away with murder but you can also get big money for simply being accused of it.

And Julie Carnes was every bit as bad as the other DA who told lies - Alex Hunter. And you already know what I think about that little attention-seeker Lou Smit, whose mad-cap theories were not even allowed in court.

.
.
.

We know Steve Thomas's role in the case, and so did Judge Carnes, so your point hardly helps the issue.

Yes, I thought you would add Judge Carnes to your ever growing list of deplorables....


What did she say that was incorrect?

[Wickerman]

He was probably under constant supervision when he was growing up.

If your child had committed these acts and killed his sister, and was lucky enough to have got away with it, then you would make sure he was supervised around other kids.

Well, if he wasn't supervised then doesn't that destroy your argument?

Was he or wasn't he supervised?

[Wickerman]

It's well known that Burke clocked her with a golf club and that he was known by neighbors as weird.

I can't think of any kid I knew that didn't hit his sister at some time or another.
This business about the faeces with Burke, he once smeared the bathroom walls with faeces too, but this could be a desperate cry for attention.
It's more aligned with nuisance behaviour than violence.

[Wickerman]

You don't have to believe all that you read.

I would fully expect him to have a girlfriend, he's rich after all. And...you know what they say....there's a cover for every pot.

I think Burke would have been capable of doing it all (and so do a lot of other people), except writing the ransom note. Children have killed other children before now, and they can be quite imaginative.

It is easy for anyone to "see Burke being capable" when their theory requires it, but it is the opinion of professionals that matter not theorists like us.
A psychological examination of Burke at the time might have gone along way to unraveling events that morning.

If the only way we can guess Burke's candidacy is to looks at children his age who do demonstrate violent and perverted sexual behaviour - yet Burke did not, then how is that a comparison?