Originally posted by Pcdunn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JonBenet Ramsey Murder case
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by AmericanSherlock View Postagreed, and if she wrote it, it then follows she was either guilty or complicit in what happened. I think very likely John was at least complicit. There are a few scenarios that are possible where the ramseys are not guilty, but covering for someone else, although these are unlikely to me. (she was killed in some sex game gone wrong somewhere else that the ramseys knew about, meaning they were involved in the seedy underworld of padeophilia).
but still think much more likely she was killed accidentally by patsy. the simplest explanation with the least leaps required imo.
I've thoroughly explored the intruder theory and all bits of so-called evidence can be discounted or explained.
I don't think the Ramseys were paedophiles. I never got those vibes from them. However, they were covering up, either for themselves or for their son.This is simply my opinion
Comment
-
Wrong, I think...
Originally posted by louisa View PostThat's true enough Pat, but the DNA that was found on JB's underpants was shown to have come from a factory worker where the pants had been made.
The 1996 murder of child beauty pageant star JonBenet Ramsey is getting a fresh look, thanks to the CBS documentary The Case Of JonBenet. The multi-part series will reunite several of the top investigators in the case in an attempt to solve the case…
However, I have heard the idea about "touch DNA" on the outside of her long-johns could have come from a worker at the packaging factory. They are two different kinds of DNA.Pat D. https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...rt/reading.gif
---------------
Von Konigswald: Jack the Ripper plays shuffleboard. -- Happy Birthday, Wanda June by Kurt Vonnegut, c.1970.
---------------
Comment
-
The DNA found on JB's clothing could have come from anywhere.
It states 'her panty' in this article.
Clothes were put into the tumble drier on the landing outside JB's bedroom, including the white blanket found on her body. The housekeeper stated that other people (from her own family) used to use JB's room and sleep in her bed and the adjoining one when the family was away.
The bottom line is that no evidence of an intruder has even been found. Nobody has ever been arrested for this crime.
No similar crime has ever been committed, before or after, this one. The killer's modus operandii has never been seen, or heard of, since.
Even if - IF - a tiny piece of unidentified DNA was found, that doesn't weigh much on the scales when weighed against the mountain of circumstancial evidence which points directly to the parents.
Originally posted by louisa View Post
If I was being asked about the horrific death of my beloved 6 year old daughter - killed in her own home by a sadistic sexual pervert - I would be crying. I wouldn't be able to talk normally and smile.Last edited by louisa; 10-21-2016, 12:12 PM.This is simply my opinion
Comment
-
Originally posted by AmericanSherlock View Post(she was killed in some sex game gone wrong somewhere else that the ramseys knew about, meaning they were involved in the seedy underworld of padeophilia).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostNeither does a mother torturing her daughter to death after an accidental head injury.
Nowhere have I EVER stated that Patsy tortured her daughter.
I gave the scenario whereby Patsy had pushed JB and JB had fallen against a hard surface. Patsy, thinking she was dead, panicked and instead of calling 911 decided to stage the scene.
JonBenet was UNCONSCIOUS and would never wake up from that blow. The staging, including the garrotting, happened afterwards.
Or my other theory - Burke accidentally, or maybe on purpose, hit JB over the head and then did the other things. Nine year old boys are sexually curious. Then the parents staged the murder and kidnap scene.
Don't ask me why they (or anyone else) would want a murder to look like a kidnapping, or a kidnapping to look like a murder, but that is what happened.
No torture was involved in this murder (because the girl was unconscious from that first blow) and if adults were involved I do not believe there was a sexual motive.This is simply my opinion
Comment
-
Originally posted by louisa View PostNo torture was involved in this murder (because the girl was unconscious from that first blow) and if adults were involved I do not believe there was a sexual motive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostIt makes no difference that JonBenet was unconscious when she was garroted. She still would've suffered from air hunger, which is why people on life support are given morphine once they turn off the ventilator.
Give me a break! You're in fantasy land now.
Harry - my sister was not given morphine when the intensive care nurse turned off her ventilator. My sister was comatose so needed no further medication.This is simply my opinion
Comment
-
Originally posted by louisa View PostThat's true enough Pat, but the DNA that was found on JB's underpants was shown to have come from a factory worker where the pants had been made.
Are you sure you don't want to change that statement, just a little?
If that was true they would have a name, so guess what my next question is going to be.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post"shown to have come from a factory worker"
Are you sure you don't want to change that statement, just a little?
If that was true they would have a name, so guess what my next question is going to be.
Would that be it?
I presume he didn't mean a precise individual, just a factory worker.This is simply my opinion
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pcdunn View PostHowever, I have heard the idea about "touch DNA" on the outside of her long-johns could have come from a worker at the packaging factory. They are two different kinds of DNA.
Is because they match, they are the same (as you know).
So, if one sample came from a factory worker (which was merely a guess), then both samples came from the same factory worker - and the police would have a name (Louisa forgot about that obvious point).
The articles did not come from the same manufacturer.
Which means contamination is ruled out.
A significant problem for "The Patsy did it" crowd.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by louisa View PostNo similar crime has ever been committed, before or after, this one. The killer's modus operandii has never been seen, or heard of, since.
Family, friends and neighbors have all testified to how caring and protective Patsy was over JB, and John has always been the perfect father & provider.
Yet, a similar sexual assault was committed in the same neighborhood in the months after JB's murder.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
Comment