-
-
I could respond but JFK stuff isn’t allowed.
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.” -
Ooops didn’t know.Comment
-
Ditto.'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard FeynmanComment
-
I assume it’s ok Sting. You only showed that there was a book out which I’m sure no one will have an issue with. You weren’t initiating any JFK debate which would have been an issue. Plus you weren’t involved in any previous discussion so you had no way of knowing.Originally posted by String View PostRegards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”Comment
-
Hi String,
You can see the moderator's verdict here:
Thanks for the link.
Cheers, GeorgeOpposing opinions doesn't mean opposing sides, in my view, it means attacking the problem from both ends. - Wickerman
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff HammComment
-
It's okay to discuss one cover up / conspiracy on casebook. The WMs of course!Sapere AudeComment
-
Or you can argue about virtually anything you'd like in Pub Talk.
I've specifically asked that the JFK assassination stay out of Ripper threads.
JMComment
Tweet
Comment