I totally agree with the last two posts.
However, the question remains. If even only one per cent of all the millions of eye witness accounts cannot possibly be explained away by ANY scientific means (including optical illusions), then that one per cent represents hundreds of incredibly compelling eye witness accounts.
However, the question remains. If even only one per cent of all the millions of eye witness accounts cannot possibly be explained away by ANY scientific means (including optical illusions), then that one per cent represents hundreds of incredibly compelling eye witness accounts.
Comment